Entropy change during the formation and death of stars

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the entropy changes associated with the formation and death of stars, including the implications of these changes within the context of closed and open systems. Participants explore theoretical aspects of entropy in stellar processes, including fusion, radiation, and the eventual fate of stars such as white dwarfs.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the formation of stars decreases entropy, but this is countered by the radiation emitted during their lifetimes, which increases overall entropy.
  • Others argue that a star is not a closed system and that while some regions can decrease entropy, the total entropy of a closed system must always increase.
  • A participant questions whether the expansion of the universe compensates for the entropy decrease in a star that has become a white dwarf, suggesting a need to compare the entropy changes due to radiation with those from the star's volume decrease.
  • One participant challenges the assertion that a star stops radiating after fusion processes end, stating that it continues to radiate at a lower temperature.
  • Another participant asserts that a decrease in entropy requires a significant input of heat, which typically does not occur in stars.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the formation of stars decreases entropy and the implications of a star's lifecycle on overall entropy. There is no consensus on the mechanisms involved or the validity of the claims made.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include assumptions about closed systems, the role of radiation in entropy changes, and the conditions under which entropy can decrease. Some statements rely on specific definitions of systems and processes that remain unresolved.

Valli RM
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The stars formation decreases the entropy but the radiations given out increases the overall entropy i am said ...but once the fusion processes are over the star no longer gives out radiations...and still the volume in which the matter particles of the star can be becomes less as the star shrinks! this lowers the entropy of the system doesn't it? (as the entropy is the volume of phase space available?)
 
Space news on Phys.org
Most entropy decrease conundrums are resolved by thinking about what constitutes a closed system. Within a closed system, some regions can decrease entropy but only by exchanging energy with other regions of that closed system. And for the entire closed system, entropy will always increase.

A star is not a closed system, it is a region inside a closed system (the universe).

I am not commenting on your statements about formation decreasing entropy etc.
 
Grinkle said:
Most entropy decrease conundrums are resolved by thinking about what constitutes a closed system. Within a closed system, some regions can decrease entropy but only by exchanging energy with other regions of that closed system. And for the entire closed system, entropy will always increase.

A star is not a closed system, it is a region inside a closed system (the universe).

I am not commenting on your statements about formation decreasing entropy etc.
Thank you so much for your answer sir.
But one more question ..If the universe is a closed system here and the star is a part of it (with nothing else close to it) , after its life time say it becomes a white dwarf with all its matter compressed to a much smaller volume thus decreasing the entropy...the star no longer can give out radiations as the fuel is over.Then is it right to say the expansion of the universe compensates for the decrease?
 
Valli RM said:
is it right to say the expansion of the universe compensates for the decrease

I don't know, but it sounds a bit out of left field to me.

I would first look at the increase in the entropy of the universe caused by the totality of radiation emitted by the star over its lifetime and compare that with the decrease in entropy of the star itself due to its decreased volume and see how that tallies. I have no experience considering the entropy of stars, you are getting my first thoughts on the matter, so buyer beware.

Edit:

My next thoughts - for a closed system, given any time slice no matter how small, the total entropy will always increase. So, if there is a ever a small enough time slice in the life cycle of a star where energy emitted by a star cannot account for the entropy decrease caused by the star shrinking, then one must find another source of entropy increase if one is to confirm the 2nd law holds. I don't know if another mechanism would become necessary or what it might be if it were necessary (to balance the entropy books, I mean).
 
Last edited:
Valli RM said:
but once the fusion processes are over the star no longer gives out radiations

This is not correct. The star is still at a nonzero temperature, so it will still radiate. It just won't radiate as much because its temperature will be lower once fusion has shut down. Even while fusion is going on, the star doesn't radiate because it has fusion going on; it radiates because it's at a certain surface temperature. Fusion is just the mechanism that maintains it at a certain surface temperature.

Valli RM said:
and still the volume in which the matter particles of the star can be becomes less as the star shrinks!

Why will the star shrink? If you're thinking of it turning into a white dwarf, it radiates during this process.

Valli RM said:
after its life time say it becomes a white dwarf with all its matter compressed to a much smaller volume thus decreasing the entropy...the star no longer can give out radiations as the fuel is over.

Incorrect. See above.
 
Valli RM said:
The stars formation decreases the entropy
Nope.

In order for a system to have a decrease in entropy, it has to have a big input of heat. This typically doesn't happen for stars.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K