Entropy of disks in a 2d box

  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d Entropy
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the entropy of a two-dimensional ideal gas composed of identical hard disks within a defined area. The original poster examines the effective area available for the disks, considering boundary effects and interactions between disks, and seeks validation of their reasoning and numerical factors in their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the effective area available to disks, questioning the correctness of the area calculations and the implications of the excluded area due to other disks. There is also inquiry into the significance of the term representing the effective area per disk.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's calculations and questioning assumptions about the area and the limits of the number of disks. Some participants suggest clarifications regarding the dimensions and the context of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Constraints include the requirement that the number of disks must be significantly less than the area available, as well as the need for clarity regarding the dimensions used in the area calculations.

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
Homework Statement
- 2d ideal gas of ##N## identical, hard disks (radius ##r##)
- inside a box of area ##A_{\mathrm{box}} = L^2##
- dilute: ##N \pi r^2 \ll A_{\mathrm{box}}##
- what is the entropy?
Relevant Equations
N/A
I'd like to check if my reasoning is right here and that the numerical factors in the final result are correct. The disks occupy an effective area ##A = (A_{\mathrm{box}}-2r)^2##, excluding the region of width ##r## at the boundary. The area available to the ##n##th disk is then ##A_n = A - 4\pi (n-1) r^2##, i.e. excluding the region of width ##r## around each of the ##(n-1)## existing disks.

Consider the zero-energy configuration, in which case the volume of phase space is then$$\Gamma = \frac{1}{N!} A_1 A_2 \dots A_N$$where ##1/N!## arises due to indistinguishability. Making use of Stirling's approximation & using the Taylor expansion of ##\log(1+x) \approx x## a few times,\begin{align*}
\log \Gamma &\approx -(N\log N - N) + \sum_{n=1}^N \log(A - 4\pi(n-1)r^2) \\
&\approx -(N\log N - N) + \sum_{n=1}^N \left\{ \log(A) - \frac{4\pi(n-1)r^2}{A} \right\} \\
&\approx N\left(1 + \log \left(\frac{A}{N}\right) - \frac{2\pi r^2}{A}(N-1) \right) \\
&\approx N\left(1 + \log \left( \frac{A}{N} -2\pi r^2 \frac{N-1}{N} \right)\right)
\end{align*}In the limit of large ##N##, then ##S \approx k_B N \left( 1 + \log\left( \frac{A}{N} - 2\pi r^2\right) \right)##.

About the term ##\frac{A}{N} - 2\pi r^2##: it seems to represent the effective area available to any given particle, with the ##2\pi r^2## an excluded area due to other disks. Is that factor right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
I'd like to check if my reasoning is right here and that the numerical factors in the final result are correct. The disks occupy an effective area ##A = (A_{\mathrm{box}}-2r)^2##, excluding the region of width ##r## at the boundary.
This doesn't look right to me. The dimensions are inconsistent.

Now I see. You probably mean A = (L - 2r)2.
 
Yes, it should be ##A = (L-2r)^2##.
As for the question itself - I was trying to figure out if there's a simple reason the correction is ##2\pi r^2##, or if it just comes out that way...
 
ergospherical said:
&\approx N\left(1 + \log \left( \frac{A}{N} -2\pi r^2 \frac{N-1}{N} \right)\right)
\end{align*}

ergospherical said:
In the limit of large ##N##, then ##S \approx k_B N \left( 1 + \log\left( \frac{A}{N} - 2\pi r^2\right) \right)##.
I wouldn't say "large N". N should only be large compared to 1, but not too large.
 
Last edited:
Yes, ##1 \ll N \ll A_{\mathrm{box}}/(\pi r^2)##
 
ergospherical said:
About the term ##\frac{A}{N} - 2\pi r^2##: it seems to represent the effective area available to any given particle, with the ##2\pi r^2## an excluded area due to other disks. Is that factor right?
I would say A - (N-1) 4π r2 is the area available to any given disk.

Is this a model for something discussed in a textbook?
I assume you got this exercise from a book, or?
 
ergospherical said:
Homework Statement: - 2d ideal gas of ##N## identical, hard disks (radius ##r##)
- inside a box of area ##A_{\mathrm{box}} = L^2##
- dilute: ##N \pi r^2 \ll A_{\mathrm{box}}##
- what is the entropy?
Relevant Equations: N/A

I'd like to check if my reasoning is right here and that the numerical factors in the final result are correct. The disks occupy an effective area ##A = (A_{\mathrm{box}}-2r)^2##, excluding the region of width ##r## at the boundary. The area available to the ##n##th disk is then ##A_n = A - 4\pi (n-1) r^2##, i.e. excluding the region of width ##r## around each of the ##(n-1)## existing disks.

Consider the zero-energy configuration, in which case the volume of phase space is then$$\Gamma = \frac{1}{N!} A_1 A_2 \dots A_N$$where ##1/N!## arises due to indistinguishability. Making use of Stirling's approximation & using the Taylor expansion of ##\log(1+x) \approx x## a few times,\begin{align*}
\log \Gamma &\approx -(N\log N - N) + \sum_{n=1}^N \log(A - 4\pi(n-1)r^2) \\
&\approx -(N\log N - N) + \sum_{n=1}^N \left\{ \log(A) - \frac{4\pi(n-1)r^2}{A} \right\} \\
&\approx N\left(1 + \log \left(\frac{A}{N}\right) - \frac{2\pi r^2}{A}(N-1) \right) \\
&\approx N\left(1 + \log \left( \frac{A}{N} -2\pi r^2 \frac{N-1}{N} \right)\right)
\end{align*}In the limit of large ##N##, then ##S \approx k_B N \left( 1 + \log\left( \frac{A}{N} - 2\pi r^2\right) \right)##.

About the term ##\frac{A}{N} - 2\pi r^2##: it seems to represent the effective area available to any given particle, with the ##2\pi r^2## an excluded area due to other disks. Is that factor right?
Did you get any feedback on your result or even a solution?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K