Entropy of disks in a 2d box

  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d Entropy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the entropy calculation for a two-dimensional ideal gas of N identical hard disks, each with radius r, confined in a box of area A_box = L^2. The effective area available for each disk is derived as A = (A_box - 2r)^2, excluding a boundary region of width r. The phase space volume is expressed as Γ = (1/N!) A_1 A_2 ... A_N, leading to the entropy formula S ≈ k_B N (1 + log(A/N - 2πr^2)). The participants confirm the necessity of the correction term 2πr^2, which accounts for the area exclusion due to other disks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statistical mechanics concepts, particularly entropy.
  • Familiarity with Stirling's approximation and Taylor expansions.
  • Knowledge of phase space volume calculations.
  • Basic principles of two-dimensional ideal gas behavior.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of entropy in statistical mechanics, focusing on systems of indistinguishable particles.
  • Explore the implications of Stirling's approximation in thermodynamic calculations.
  • Investigate the effects of particle interactions in two-dimensional systems.
  • Learn about the application of phase space concepts in statistical mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, students, and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, will benefit from this discussion.

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
Homework Statement
- 2d ideal gas of ##N## identical, hard disks (radius ##r##)
- inside a box of area ##A_{\mathrm{box}} = L^2##
- dilute: ##N \pi r^2 \ll A_{\mathrm{box}}##
- what is the entropy?
Relevant Equations
N/A
I'd like to check if my reasoning is right here and that the numerical factors in the final result are correct. The disks occupy an effective area ##A = (A_{\mathrm{box}}-2r)^2##, excluding the region of width ##r## at the boundary. The area available to the ##n##th disk is then ##A_n = A - 4\pi (n-1) r^2##, i.e. excluding the region of width ##r## around each of the ##(n-1)## existing disks.

Consider the zero-energy configuration, in which case the volume of phase space is then$$\Gamma = \frac{1}{N!} A_1 A_2 \dots A_N$$where ##1/N!## arises due to indistinguishability. Making use of Stirling's approximation & using the Taylor expansion of ##\log(1+x) \approx x## a few times,\begin{align*}
\log \Gamma &\approx -(N\log N - N) + \sum_{n=1}^N \log(A - 4\pi(n-1)r^2) \\
&\approx -(N\log N - N) + \sum_{n=1}^N \left\{ \log(A) - \frac{4\pi(n-1)r^2}{A} \right\} \\
&\approx N\left(1 + \log \left(\frac{A}{N}\right) - \frac{2\pi r^2}{A}(N-1) \right) \\
&\approx N\left(1 + \log \left( \frac{A}{N} -2\pi r^2 \frac{N-1}{N} \right)\right)
\end{align*}In the limit of large ##N##, then ##S \approx k_B N \left( 1 + \log\left( \frac{A}{N} - 2\pi r^2\right) \right)##.

About the term ##\frac{A}{N} - 2\pi r^2##: it seems to represent the effective area available to any given particle, with the ##2\pi r^2## an excluded area due to other disks. Is that factor right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
I'd like to check if my reasoning is right here and that the numerical factors in the final result are correct. The disks occupy an effective area ##A = (A_{\mathrm{box}}-2r)^2##, excluding the region of width ##r## at the boundary.
This doesn't look right to me. The dimensions are inconsistent.

Now I see. You probably mean A = (L - 2r)2.
 
Yes, it should be ##A = (L-2r)^2##.
As for the question itself - I was trying to figure out if there's a simple reason the correction is ##2\pi r^2##, or if it just comes out that way...
 
ergospherical said:
&\approx N\left(1 + \log \left( \frac{A}{N} -2\pi r^2 \frac{N-1}{N} \right)\right)
\end{align*}

ergospherical said:
In the limit of large ##N##, then ##S \approx k_B N \left( 1 + \log\left( \frac{A}{N} - 2\pi r^2\right) \right)##.
I wouldn't say "large N". N should only be large compared to 1, but not too large.
 
Last edited:
Yes, ##1 \ll N \ll A_{\mathrm{box}}/(\pi r^2)##
 
ergospherical said:
About the term ##\frac{A}{N} - 2\pi r^2##: it seems to represent the effective area available to any given particle, with the ##2\pi r^2## an excluded area due to other disks. Is that factor right?
I would say A - (N-1) 4π r2 is the area available to any given disk.

Is this a model for something discussed in a textbook?
I assume you got this exercise from a book, or?
 
ergospherical said:
Homework Statement: - 2d ideal gas of ##N## identical, hard disks (radius ##r##)
- inside a box of area ##A_{\mathrm{box}} = L^2##
- dilute: ##N \pi r^2 \ll A_{\mathrm{box}}##
- what is the entropy?
Relevant Equations: N/A

I'd like to check if my reasoning is right here and that the numerical factors in the final result are correct. The disks occupy an effective area ##A = (A_{\mathrm{box}}-2r)^2##, excluding the region of width ##r## at the boundary. The area available to the ##n##th disk is then ##A_n = A - 4\pi (n-1) r^2##, i.e. excluding the region of width ##r## around each of the ##(n-1)## existing disks.

Consider the zero-energy configuration, in which case the volume of phase space is then$$\Gamma = \frac{1}{N!} A_1 A_2 \dots A_N$$where ##1/N!## arises due to indistinguishability. Making use of Stirling's approximation & using the Taylor expansion of ##\log(1+x) \approx x## a few times,\begin{align*}
\log \Gamma &\approx -(N\log N - N) + \sum_{n=1}^N \log(A - 4\pi(n-1)r^2) \\
&\approx -(N\log N - N) + \sum_{n=1}^N \left\{ \log(A) - \frac{4\pi(n-1)r^2}{A} \right\} \\
&\approx N\left(1 + \log \left(\frac{A}{N}\right) - \frac{2\pi r^2}{A}(N-1) \right) \\
&\approx N\left(1 + \log \left( \frac{A}{N} -2\pi r^2 \frac{N-1}{N} \right)\right)
\end{align*}In the limit of large ##N##, then ##S \approx k_B N \left( 1 + \log\left( \frac{A}{N} - 2\pi r^2\right) \right)##.

About the term ##\frac{A}{N} - 2\pi r^2##: it seems to represent the effective area available to any given particle, with the ##2\pi r^2## an excluded area due to other disks. Is that factor right?
Did you get any feedback on your result or even a solution?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K