Entropy reversal in an infinite static universe?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of the Poincaré recurrence theorem in the context of an infinite static universe. Leonard Susskind's lecture suggests that vacuum decay could lead to a static universe with no energy, negating the possibility of recurrence. However, a contrasting viewpoint indicates that in a static universe without accelerated expansion, the Poincaré recurrence theorem remains applicable. The key requirement for recurrence is a finite phase space, which could be achieved if the universe is closed, resembling a 3-dimensional sphere.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Poincaré recurrence theorem
  • Familiarity with vacuum energy concepts
  • Knowledge of cosmological constants and their implications
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics, specifically Hilbert space
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Poincaré recurrence theorem in cosmology
  • Explore Leonard Susskind's theories on vacuum decay and static universes
  • Investigate the relationship between cosmological constants and universe topology
  • Study the properties of closed universes and their phase spaces
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of entropy, universe topology, and the implications of vacuum energy on cosmic evolution.

Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
Entropy reversal in an infinite static universe?
As far as I know, entropy could be reversed by the Poincaré recurrence theorem if it had a finite horizon given by some amount of vacuum energy causing an accelerating expansion.

However, I found this lecture by Leonard Susskind () where he tells a way through which the vacuum could decay into a vacuum state with no energy and therefore no expansion would occur. In this case, we would have a static universe. However, he says that in this case no recurrence would take place.

But, in this answer to one similar question on another physics-discussion site (Could any new structures be formed after the heat death of the universe?), it says that in a static universe with no accelerated expansion (and therefore no cosmological constant) the Poincarré recurrence theorem would hold. And also, I understand that in a non-accelerating expanding universe there would be no maximal entropy reached so the recurrence should occur.

So, what am I missing here?
 
Space news on Phys.org
For the Poincare recurrence to exist, the essential requirement is that the phase space of all possible initial conditions has a finite volume. (In the quantum version, it translates to the finite dimension of the Hilbert space.) If there is a cosmological constant, then the universe has the horizon which makes it effectively finite, so the Poincare recurrence seems plausible. If there is no cosmological constant, and hence no horizon, the Poincare recurrence requires some other mechanism by which the universe has a finite volume. A reasonable possibility is that the universe is closed, i.e. that its spatial topology is a 3-dimensional sphere. I didn't watch the video, but I suspect that Susskind had such a closed universe in mind.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeterDonis

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K