EPE at a point due to two point charges

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of electric potential energy (EPE) in systems of point charges, specifically focusing on scenarios involving two and three deuterium nuclei. Participants explore how to calculate the total EPE when multiple charges are involved and the implications of their movements and interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how the formula for EPE applies to a system of two point charges and whether it accurately represents the total EPE.
  • There is a proposal to consider the EPE contributions from each pair of nuclei when calculating the total EPE for three deuterium nuclei, leading to a suggested formula involving the sum of EPE from each pair.
  • One participant argues that no work is done on the first charge brought from infinity, suggesting that only the work done by bringing the second charge should be considered.
  • Another participant raises a concern about whether the EPE can be calculated by considering only one nucleus or if both should be included, especially when they are moving towards each other.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between work done, force, and displacement, with questions about how to account for multiple forces acting on the nuclei.
  • Some participants suggest that the total work done can be calculated by summing the forces of all nuclei multiplied by their displacements, while others caution against this approach.
  • One participant proposes using energy or work done equations to simplify the equation of motion for two point charges, questioning the applicability of Lagrangian mechanics in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to calculate total EPE in systems with multiple charges, with no consensus reached on the best approach. Some agree on certain aspects of the calculations, while others raise challenges and alternative perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding how to apply the EPE formula in different scenarios, including the assumptions made about the movement and interaction of charges. There are unresolved questions regarding the mathematical steps involved in calculating total EPE.

elemis
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
CodeCogsEqn.gif


The above equation gives the EPE of two point charges separated by a distance r.

Firstly, I do not understand how this formula gives the TOTAL EPE of the system.

Secondly, let's say I have three deuterium nuclei moving towards one another with initial speed V.

They all stop instantaneously at the same point such that they are all separated from one another by distance r.

How would the above formula change to give the total EPE of the system ? Would you consider each pair of nuclei ?

So total EPE of system = (EPE of 1st+2nd) + (1st+3rd) + (2nd+3rd) ?

Hence, the formula becomes
CodeCogsEqn-1.gif
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi elemis! :smile:
elemis said:
Firstly, I do not understand how this formula gives the TOTAL EPE of the system.

no work is done bringing the first charge from infinity

so you only need to consider the work done by bringing the second charge
Secondly, let's say I have three deuterium nuclei moving towards one another with initial speed V.

They all stop instantaneously at the same point such that they are all separated from one another by distance r.

How would the above formula change to give the total EPE of the system ? Would you consider each pair of nuclei ?

potential energy is defined as minus the work done (per charge) …

if there's more than one force, how does that affect the total work done? :wink:
 
Hi TinyTim ! We meet again !

attachment.php?attachmentid=141266&d=1334228946.png


Please have a look at the above image i.e. part (a)

You are telling me that no EPE is gained by one of the nuclei ?

So we consider the EPE of only one?

EDIT : How is that possible when both are moving towards one another and both are trying to overcome the repulsive force of the other ?
 
work done = force "dot" displacement

if they're both moving, wouldn't you expect the displacement of one to be halved, and the total distance to remain the same? :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
work done = force "dot" displacement

if they're both moving, wouldn't you expect the displacement of one to be halved, and the total distance to remain the same? :wink:
Could you elaborate ? Are you saying r in the very first formula at the top of the page is in fact r/2
 
tiny-tim said:
if there's more than one force, how does that affect the total work done? :wink:

So is it the sum of the forces of all the nuclei multiplied by their displacement ?
 
elemis said:
Are you saying r in the very first formula at the top of the page is in fact r/2

no, the result will be the same

but you can obtain it either by bringing one charge from infinity (zero work), then bringing the other charge (∫ F(r).dr)

or by bringing both charges from infinity together (∫ F(r).d(r/2) + ∫F(r).d(r/2)) :wink:
elemis said:
So is it the sum of the forces of all the nuclei multiplied by their displacement ?

yes, but you'd be crazy to try to do it that way …

bring each charge from infinity one at a time :smile:
 
Before we all get confused, let's deal with the question in post no. 3 first.

Its alright to do that i.e. pretend one nuclei moves to the collision point and calculate the change in EPE (zero for the first one because both are at infinity at feel no repulsion) and calculate the change in EPE for the other ?
 
yes :smile:

(and there's no problem with the "fixed" one having speed v … we can bring the other one in as fast or as slow as we like, and the speed makes no difference to the force (if we're ignoring relativity))
 
  • #10
With regards to this setup of two point charges, I was thinking the other day (assuming both charges are the same magnitude and opposite sign...) What is the equation of motion? If we write Coulomb's Force Law then the equation seems hard to solve. Can we use energy/ work done equations to solve the equation of motion more simply? Or use Lagrangian mechanics methods??
 
  • #11
tiny-tim said:
yes :smile:

(and there's no problem with the "fixed" one having speed v … we can bring the other one in as fast or as slow as we like, and the speed makes no difference to the force (if we're ignoring relativity))
Thank you very much TinyTim ! As always, I am much obliged.

You have literally answered a query that my teacher couldn't explain and has been 'thinking' about for the last six months.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
281
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K