EPR & Bell: What's Wrong with My Scenario?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter theargosy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bell Epr
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a hypothetical scenario involving entangled electrons and faster-than-light communication. Participants explore the implications of measuring the spin of entangled particles, the nature of entanglement, and the limitations of communication based on quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a scenario where a traveler changes the spin of an entangled electron to signal their arrival on Mars, suggesting this could imply faster-than-light communication.
  • Several participants argue that measuring the spin of an entangled electron does not provide information about changes in spin without prior measurements, as entangled particles do not have definite spins until measured.
  • It is noted that an Earth observer cannot determine if a spin change has occurred based solely on their measurement, as they cannot know the sequence of measurements made by the traveler.
  • Participants clarify that entangled particles exist in a superposition of states and that measuring one particle collapses the entangled state, making subsequent measurements independent.
  • Some participants emphasize that if both particles are initially measured as spin-up, the Earth observer will always measure spin-up, regardless of the traveler's actions, indicating no signal is sent.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the implications of the scenario regarding communication and the nature of entanglement. There is no consensus on whether the proposed scenario allows for faster-than-light communication or if it accurately represents the behavior of entangled particles.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of entanglement and measurement, as well as the unresolved nature of the proposed scenario's implications for communication.

theargosy
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
What is wrong with my scenario?

A traveler is about to embark on a mission to Mars. A technician is responsible for communications with the traveler. An entangled pair of electrons is prepared, one to make the trip to Mars and one to remain on Earth.

When the traveler reaches Mars he changes the spin on his entangled electron. Simultaneously by measurement on both sides, the Earth-bound electron changes spin.

By prior agreement, the change in spin indicates the arrival of the traveler on Mars, by faster than light communication.

Brian Wachter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can know the spin only if you measure it.
If you measure it, you will get up or down.
It doesn't tell you if the spin has changed or not.
Remember the 2 electrons' spins were entangled.
So no electron has a definite spin to start with.
 
Last edited:
The Earth observer had no way of knowing that the spin has changed with only one measurement.

Say he measures his particle and gets spin-up. He has no way of knowing whether he's performed the first measurement on the pair, the astronaut hasn't yet arrived and will measure spin-down when he arrives; or whether the astronaut has already arrived, performed the first measurement, and gotten spin-down.
 
Nugatory said:
The Earth observer had no way of knowing that the spin has changed with only one measurement.

Say he measures his particle and gets spin-up. He has no way of knowing whether he's performed the first measurement on the pair, the astronaut hasn't yet arrived and will measure spin-down when he arrives; or whether the astronaut has already arrived, performed the first measurement, and gotten spin-down.

When the traveler leaves Earth both particles are spin up. The earth-bound particle will simply be monitored. When the traveler reaches Mars he resets his particle's spin. The technician records this as the signal that the traveler has reached Mars.
 
eltodesukane said:
You can know the spin only if you measure it.
If you measure it, you will get up or down.
It doesn't tell you if the spin has changed or not.
Remember the 2 electrons' spins were entangled.
So no electron has a definite spin to start with.

You mean I can't have an initial spin and know what it is?
 
theargosy said:
You mean I can't have an initial spin and know what it is?

Welcome to PhysicsForums, theargosy!

You can have an initial spin and know what it is. That particle will not be entangled with anything, however.

Entangled particles are in what is called a "superposition" of states. They do not have a fixed knowable value until measured.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: theargosy
theargosy said:
When the traveler leaves Earth both particles are spin up. The earth-bound particle will simply be monitored.

There's no way to do that. Two problems:
First, you can't "monitor" a particle's spin without measuring it. And once you perform that measurement, they're no longer entangled so all subsequent measurements of the two particles will be completely independent and uncorrelated.
Second, there is no such thing as two entangled particles in a known spin-up state - You can only have entanglement when the state of the two particles is a superposition of the two possible outcomes for the pair, and you don't know which you have until after you've performed the one measurement that breaks the entanglement.

If we're going to use the language of wave function collapse, an entangled state is something like ##|\psi\rangle=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(|++\rangle+|--\rangle)## where ##|++\rangle## and ##|--\rangle## are the states "both particles are spin up" and "both particles are spin down". Any measurement performed on either particle causes the wave function to collapse randomly to either ##|++\rangle## or ##|--\rangle## and then you just have two independent particles both of which happened to have the same spin when we first looked at them, but are now evolving independently of one another.
 
theargosy said:
When the traveler leaves Earth both particles are spin up.
In that case, the observer on Earth will always measure spin up, no matter what happens to the spin on Mars. So again no signal is sent.
 
DrChinese said:
Welcome to PhysicsForums, theargosy!

You can have an initial spin and know what it is. That particle will not be entangled with anything, however.

Entangled particles are in what is called a "superposition" of states. They do not have a fixed knowable value until measured.
Thanks!
 
  • #10
Nugatory said:
The Earth observer had no way of knowing that the spin has changed with only one measurement.

Say he measures his particle and gets spin-up. He has no way of knowing whether he's performed the first measurement on the pair, the astronaut hasn't yet arrived and will measure spin-down when he arrives; or whether the astronaut has already arrived, performed the first measurement, and gotten spin-down.
Thank you.
 
  • #11
Avodyne said:
In that case, the observer on Earth will always measure spin up, no matter what happens to the spin on Mars. So again no signal is sent.
Thank you a bunch.
 
  • #12
Avodyne said:
In that case, the observer on Earth will always measure spin up, no matter what happens to the spin on Mars. So again no signal is sent.
I thank you!
 
  • #13
Avodyne said:
In that case, the observer on Earth will always measure spin up, no matter what happens to the spin on Mars. So again no signal is sent.
Thanks.
 
  • #14
Nugatory said:
There's no way to do that. Two problems:
First, you can't "monitor" a particle's spin without measuring it. And once you perform that measurement, they're no longer entangled so all subsequent measurements of the two particles will be completely independent and uncorrelated.
Second, there is no such thing as two entangled particles in a known spin-up state - You can only have entanglement when the state of the two particles is a superposition of the two possible outcomes for the pair, and you don't know which you have until after you've performed the one measurement that breaks the entanglement.

If we're going to use the language of wave function collapse, an entangled state is something like ##|\psi\rangle=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(|++\rangle+|--\rangle)## where ##|++\rangle## and ##|--\rangle## are the states "both particles are spin up" and "both particles are spin down". Any measurement performed on either particle causes the wave function to collapse randomly to either ##|++\rangle## or ##|--\rangle## and then you just have two independent particles both of which happened to have the same spin when we first looked at them, but are now evolving independently of one another.
Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
12K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K