Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent experiment titled "Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km" demonstrates a definitive violation of Bell's inequality without relying on additional assumptions. Conducted by researchers including B. Hensen and H. Bernien, the experiment utilized an event-ready scheme to achieve high-fidelity entanglement and employed efficient spin readout to eliminate the detection loophole. The results showed a violation of the CHSH-Bell inequality with S=2.42±0.20, providing strong evidence against local realist theories and advancing the field of quantum communication.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bell's theorem and its implications in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with quantum entanglement and its measurement techniques
  • Knowledge of CHSH-Bell inequality and its significance in experimental physics
  • Experience with statistical hypothesis testing in scientific research
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of loophole-free Bell tests in quantum communication technologies
  • Research advanced techniques in quantum entanglement generation and measurement
  • Study the role of locality and realism in quantum mechanics and their philosophical implications
  • Investigate the applications of device-independent quantum-secure communication
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, experimental researchers in quantum mechanics, and professionals in quantum communication technology will benefit from this discussion.

DrChinese
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
8,498
Reaction score
2,131
A great new experiment is reported closing simultaneously the loopholes of detection (fair sampling assumption) and distance (locality assumption):

Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km
B. Hensen, H. Bernien, A.E. Dréau, A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, M.S. Blok, J. Ruitenberg, R.F.L. Vermeulen, R.N. Schouten, C. Abellán, W. Amaya, V. Pruneri, M. W. Mitchell, M. Markham, D.J. Twitchen, D. Elkouss, S. Wehner, T.H. Taminiau, R. Hanson
(Submitted on 24 Aug 2015)
For more than 80 years, the counterintuitive predictions of quantum theory have stimulated debate about the nature of reality. In his seminal work, John Bell proved that no theory of nature that obeys locality and realism can reproduce all the predictions of quantum theory. Bell showed that in any local realist theory the correlations between distant measurements satisfy an inequality and, moreover, that this inequality can be violated according to quantum theory. This provided a recipe for experimental tests of the fundamental principles underlying the laws of nature. In the past decades, numerous ingenious Bell inequality tests have been reported. However, because of experimental limitations, all experiments to date required additional assumptions to obtain a contradiction with local realism, resulting in loopholes. Here we report on a Bell experiment that is free of any such additional assumption and thus directly tests the principles underlying Bell's inequality. We employ an event-ready scheme that enables the generation of high-fidelity entanglement between distant electron spins. Efficient spin readout avoids the fair sampling assumption (detection loophole), while the use of fast random basis selection and readout combined with a spatial separation of 1.3 km ensure the required locality conditions. We perform 245 trials testing the CHSH-Bell inequality S≤2 and find S=2.42±0.20. A null hypothesis test yields a probability of p=0.039 that a local-realist model for space-like separated sites produces data with a violation at least as large as observed, even when allowing for memory in the devices. This result rules out large classes of local realist theories, and paves the way for implementing device-independent quantum-secure communication and randomness certification.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.05949

Enjoy!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShayanJ
Physics news on Phys.org
Finally!
But I think everyone was expecting this anyway.
BTW, its good news.
Thanks DrChinese.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
7K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K