MHB What is the Epsilon-Delta Method for Proving Limits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycmathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The epsilon-delta method is employed to prove that the limit of the function (1 + 2x)/(3 - x) as x approaches 1 is 3/2. The proof involves establishing a delta such that |x - 1| < delta implies |f(x) - 3/2| < epsilon. By manipulating the inequality and restricting |x - 1|, the proof concludes with delta defined as the minimum of 1 and (6/7) * epsilon, thereby confirming the limit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Epsilon-delta definitions of limits
  • Basic algebraic manipulation
  • Understanding of inequalities
  • Familiarity with functions and limits in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formal definition of limits using the epsilon-delta approach
  • Practice proving limits with various functions using epsilon-delta proofs
  • Explore the concept of continuity and its relation to limits
  • Learn about the implications of limits in calculus, such as derivatives and integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of limit proofs using the epsilon-delta method.

nycmathdad
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Use the epsilon-delta method to show that the limit is 3/2 for the given function.

lim (1 + 2x)/(3 - x) = 3/2
x-->1

I want to find a delta so that | x - 1| < delta implies |f(x) - L| < epsilon.

| (1 + 2x)/(3 - x) - (3/2) | < epsilon

-epsilon < (1 + 2x)/(3 - x) - 3/2 < epsilon

I now add 3/2 to all terms.

(3/2) - epsilon < (1 + 2x)/(3 - x) < (3/2) + epsilonStuck here...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are nowhere near ready for $\displaystyle \epsilon \,\delta $ proofs, but for anyone playing at home...

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left| \frac{1 + 2\,x}{3 - x} - \frac{3}{2} \right| &< \epsilon \\
\left| \frac{2 \left( 1 + 2\,x \right) - 3 \left( 3 - x \right) }{ 2 \left( 3 - x \right) } \right| &< \epsilon \\
\left| \frac{2 + 4\,x - 9 + 3\,x}{2 \left( 3 - x \right) } \right| &< \epsilon \\
\left| \frac{7\,x - 7}{2 \left( 3 - x \right) } \right| &< \epsilon \\
\frac{7 \left| x - 1 \right| }{ 2 \left| 3 - x \right| } &< \epsilon \\
\frac{\left| x - 1 \right| }{\left| x - 3 \right| } &< \frac{2\,\epsilon}{7} \\
\left| x - 1 \right| &< \frac{2\,\epsilon}{7} \, \left| x - 3 \right| \end{align*} $

Now suppose we restrict $\displaystyle \left| x - 1 \right| < 1 $ for example, then

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} -1 < x - 1 &< 1 \\
-3 < x - 3 &< -1 \end{align*}$

so we can say for certain that if $\displaystyle \left| x - 1 \right| < 1 $, then $\displaystyle \left| x - 3 \right| < 3 $. Therefore

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left| x - 1 \right| < \frac{2\,\epsilon}{7}\,\left| x - 3 \right| &< \frac{2\,\epsilon}{7} \cdot 3 \\
\left| x - 1 \right| < \frac{2\,\epsilon}{7}\,\left| x - 3 \right| &< \frac{6\,\epsilon}{7} \\
\left| x - 1 \right| &< \frac{6\,\epsilon}{7} \end{align*} $

So we can finally get to the proof now...

Let $\displaystyle \delta = \min \left\{ 1, \frac{6\,\epsilon}{7} \right\} $, then reverse every step and you are done.
 
Beer soaked ramblings follow.
Prove It said:
You are nowhere near ready for $\displaystyle \epsilon \,\delta $ proofs, but for anyone playing at home...
I think you just captured the essence of him who's perpetually stuck.
 
Prove It said:
You are nowhere near ready for $\displaystyle \epsilon \,\delta $ proofs, but for anyone playing at home...

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left| \frac{1 + 2\,x}{3 - x} - \frac{3}{2} \right| &< \epsilon \\
\left| \frac{2 \left( 1 + 2\,x \right) - 3 \left( 3 - x \right) }{ 2 \left( 3 - x \right) } \right| &< \epsilon \\
\left| \frac{2 + 4\,x - 9 + 3\,x}{2 \left( 3 - x \right) } \right| &< \epsilon \\
\left| \frac{7\,x - 7}{2 \left( 3 - x \right) } \right| &< \epsilon \\
\frac{7 \left| x - 1 \right| }{ 2 \left| 3 - x \right| } &< \epsilon \\
\frac{\left| x - 1 \right| }{\left| x - 3 \right| } &< \frac{2\,\epsilon}{7} \\
\left| x - 1 \right| &< \frac{2\,\epsilon}{7} \, \left| x - 3 \right| \end{align*} $

Now suppose we restrict $\displaystyle \left| x - 1 \right| < 1 $ for example, then

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} -1 < x - 1 &< 1 \\
-3 < x - 3 &< -1 \end{align*}$

so we can say for certain that if $\displaystyle \left| x - 1 \right| < 1 $, then $\displaystyle \left| x - 3 \right| < 3 $. Therefore

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left| x - 1 \right| < \frac{2\,\epsilon}{7}\,\left| x - 3 \right| &< \frac{2\,\epsilon}{7} \cdot 3 \\
\left| x - 1 \right| < \frac{2\,\epsilon}{7}\,\left| x - 3 \right| &< \frac{6\,\epsilon}{7} \\
\left| x - 1 \right| &< \frac{6\,\epsilon}{7} \end{align*} $

So we can finally get to the proof now...

Let $\displaystyle \delta = \min \left\{ 1, \frac{6\,\epsilon}{7} \right\} $, then reverse every step and you are done.

Wish I knew how to do this stuff. Thanks Prove It.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K