Equal sets and bijective correspondence

  • Thread starter Thread starter mizunoami
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of equal sets and their bijective correspondence. The original poster is attempting to prove that if two sets [n] and [m] are equal, then there exists a bijection between them, specifically focusing on demonstrating the properties of surjectivity and injectivity of a defined function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster defines a function based on the elements of the sets and seeks to establish its properties. Some participants question the terminology used regarding "equal" versus "equivalent" sets, while others suggest a straightforward approach to demonstrate the bijection by showing that the function is both one-to-one and onto.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of set equality and providing guidance on how to rigorously prove the properties of the function. There is a recognition of the existence of a bijection, but the original poster is looking for a more formal proof structure.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the definitions of set equality and the implications for establishing bijective functions. The original poster is navigating through the requirements of a rigorous mathematical proof while some assumptions about the nature of the sets are being discussed.

mizunoami
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If [n] and [m] are equal, then they are bijective correspondent.

I define [itex]f \subset\{(n,m)\mid n \in [n], m\in [m]\}[/itex]. Suppose [n]=[m]. Let[itex](n,m_1),(n,m_2)\in f.[/itex] Because [n]=[m], then [itex]m_1=m_2[/itex]. So for all [itex]n \in [n][/itex], there exists a unique [itex]m\in [m][/itex] such that f(n)=m. So f is a function.

Next I want to prove f is surjective and injective. But I'm stuck. How can I make use of the supposition [n]=[m] to prove surjectivity and injectivity?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean "equal" or "equivalent"? In order to be equal, sets A and B must be identical- they contain exactly the same elements. In order to be equivalent, they must have the same cardinality- contain exactly the same number of elements. In either case, there is an obvious bijection.
 
I mean equal - so both sets contain the same elements.

Yeah, there is obviously a bijection. But how can I show that using a rigorous mathematical proof?
 
The obvious way- show that f, from [m] to [n], defined by f(x)= x, is both "one-to-one" and "onto". And that should be easy- if f(a)= f(b), what must be true of a and b? Let c be a member of [n]. What member of [m] is mapped to c?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K