Equality holds in Minkowski's Inequality when

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter benorin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on determining the necessary and sufficient conditions for equality to hold in Minkowski's Inequality within the context of L^{p}(X,μ) spaces, particularly when allowing for complex functions f and g. The inequality is expressed as {∫_X |f+g|^p dμ}^{1/p} ≤ {∫_X |f|^p dμ}^{1/p} + {∫_X |g|^p dμ}^{1/p} for 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞. The discussion references Rudin's text for the proof via Hölder's Inequality, emphasizing that equality in Minkowski's Inequality occurs when one function is a constant multiple of the other, i.e., f = ag.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of L^{p} spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with Minkowski's Inequality and its applications
  • Knowledge of Hölder's Inequality and its implications
  • Basic concepts of complex functions and their measurability
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Minkowski's Inequality in functional analysis
  • Study the conditions for equality in Hölder's Inequality
  • Explore the generalizations of L^{p} spaces for complex functions
  • Investigate applications of Minkowski's Inequality in various mathematical fields
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of functional analysis, and researchers interested in inequalities in L^{p} spaces, particularly those working with complex functions.

benorin
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,442
Reaction score
191
I would like to determine necessary and sufficient conditions for equality to hold in Minkowski's Inequality in L^{p}(X,\mu).

For 1\leq p\leq \infty, we have \forall f,g\in L^{p}(X,\mu)

\left\{\int_X \left| f+g\right| ^{p} d\mu\right\} ^{\frac{1}{p}} \leq \left\{\int_X \left| f\right| ^{p} d\mu\right\} ^{\frac{1}{p}} + \left\{\int_X \left| g\right| ^{p} d\mu\right\} ^{\frac{1}{p}}

here I wish to allow f and g to be complex. Any help would be nice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So I think I have all the pieces, but I lack your brain power.

Minkowski's Inequality is proved (in Rudin's text) via Holder's Inequality, namely

For \frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=1, 1< p< \infty,1<q< \infty,, and let f and g be measurable functions on X with range in \left[ 0, \infty\right]. Then

\left\{\int_X fg d\mu\right\}\leq \left\{\int_X f^{p} d\mu\right\} ^{\frac{1}{p}}\left\{\int_X g^{q} d\mu\right\} ^{\frac{1}{q}}

To prove Minkowski's put (f+g)^{p}=f(f+g)^{p-1}+g(f+g)^{p-1} and apply Holder's inequality to each of the terms on the right, that is

\left\{\int_X f(f+g)^{p-1} d\mu\right\}\leq \left\{\int_X f^{p} d\mu\right\} ^{\frac{1}{p}}\left\{\int_X (f+g)^{(p-1)q} d\mu\right\} ^{\frac{1}{q}}

and

\left\{\int_X g(f+g)^{p-1} d\mu\right\}\leq \left\{\int_X g^{p} d\mu\right\} ^{\frac{1}{p}}\left\{\int_X (f+g)^{(p-1)q} d\mu\right\} ^{\frac{1}{q}}

note that (p-1)q=p and that 1/q=1-1/p then add the above inequalities to get Minkowski's inequality in the following form:

\left\{\int_X \left( f+g\right) ^{p} d\mu\right\} ^{\frac{1}{p}} \leq \left\{\int_X f^{p} d\mu\right\} ^{\frac{1}{p}} + \left\{\int_X g^{p} d\mu\right\} ^{\frac{1}{p}}

for non-negative f and g. Equality holds in Holder's inequality if, and only if, there are constants a and b such that af^p=bg^q.

To arrive at the form of Minkowski's inequality I have posted above, note that

\left| f + g \right| \leq \left| f \right| + \left| g \right| \Rightarrow \left| f + g \right| ^{p} \leq \left( \left| f \right| + \left| g \right| \right) ^{p}

by the triangle inequality. For complex f and g, their magnitudes |f| and |g| are non-negative and measurable if f and g are (so it is ok to generalize as such.) Based on the conditions for equality to hold in Holder's Inequality, what are the conditions for equality to hold in Minkowski's Ineqaulity for complex f and g?
 
Last edited:
when one function is a constant multiple of the other, ie f = ag or somethng like that
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K