Equation for dissipation of a capacitor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the evaluation of voltage dissipation in an RC circuit under two scenarios: an instantaneous voltage reduction and a linear voltage decrease over time. The first scenario utilizes the equation v(t) = (V_0 - V_1)e^(-t/τ) + V_1, where V_0 is the initial voltage and V_1 is the reduced voltage. The second scenario involves a time-dependent input voltage, V(t) = -3t, leading to a differential equation that incorporates Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and requires integration to solve for the capacitor voltage, v_c. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding KVL and differential equations in analyzing RC circuits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of RC circuit theory
  • Familiarity with Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Knowledge of differential equations
  • Basic calculus for integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the voltage equation for RC circuits using KVL
  • Learn about solving first-order non-homogeneous differential equations
  • Explore the application of integrating factors in differential equations
  • Review circuit analysis techniques in Boyce and DiPrima's textbook
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, circuit designers, and students studying circuit analysis who need to understand voltage dissipation in RC circuits and the application of differential equations in circuit behavior.

drewbagel423
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to evaluation the voltage of an RC circuit as it is dissipating a stored charge. Actually trying to do this under two different situations.

The first is let's say the circuit has reached steady state for a given input voltage, Vo. Now I reduce the voltage instantly to some value V1 greater than zero, but less than its original value. I assume it would resemble some sort of exponential decay function, like e^(-t/tau), but how would Vo and V1 factor into the equation?


Okay, now take the same circuit. But let's say instead of using the step function in the previous example for the voltage, it now decreases linearly over time, like V(t) =-3 Volts/min. What would the response equation look like now?

Hopefully that makes sense, I've been wracking my brain over this for the past couple days.

TIA
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Off the top of my head...

I think the equation is

v(t) = (V_0-V_1)e^{-t/\tau}+V_1

Check this by using your 2 boundary conditions v(0) = V_0 and V(infty) = V1

You can find the derivation of this in most basic circuits book.

I can't imagine a cap's voltage dropping off linearly vs. time. Does anyone know how?
 
i'm not trying to get the cap's voltage to drop linearly, I'm saying what if the voltage into the cap drops linearly with time, how do this change the formula you posted?

for instance, in the formula you gave, Vo @ t=0 is 30, V1 @ t=1s is 27, V2 @ t=2s is 24, etc
 
Well you would just have to go back to the basics and write the KVL equation.
 
sorry, you're talking to an ME, have no idea what the KVL equation is
 
Do you remember solving circuits equations by writing a loop equation to sum up all the voltage drops? Then you set this equation to zero?
 
yes, i do remember doing that, basically adding up all the nodes, right?
 
That was Kirchoff's current law (KCL). You could try doing that too if you want... But for a simple RC circuit. It's better to use Kirchoff's voltage law instead.

PS: Is this a mental exercise?
 
No this is something I'm having trouble with at work

I think I have an understanding but I'm having a problem putting it all together

KVL says the sum of the voltage in a loop is equal to zero.

\sum V_{loop} = 0

so if the input voltage is a function of time

V(t) = -3t

the equation for the capacitor is

I = C \frac{dV}{dt} \Rightarrow \int\frac{dV}{dt}=\frac{I}{C} \Rightarrow V = \frac{I}{C}t +a

and the resistor is

V=IR

putting it all together

-3t = \frac{I}{C}t + IR + a

am i on the right track so far?
 
  • #10
Can you just show us a simplified schematic of the circuit you've got.
 
  • #11
417px-Series-RC.svg.png
 
  • #12
So if KVL serves me correctly...

Vin - I R - V = 0
V_{in} - C \frac {dv_c}{dt} R - v_c = 0
RC \frac {dv_c}{dt} + v_c = V_{in}

After this its just math...
 
  • #13
ok so my calc is a little rusty, but here goes: (using V_{in}(t) = At)

RC\frac{dv_{c}}{dt} + v_{c} = At

integrating both sides with respect to t (not sure about this part)

RCv_{c} + v_{c}t = \frac{At^{2}}{2}+constant

solving for v_{c}

v_{c}(RC+t) = \frac{At^{2}}{2}+constant \Rightarrow v_{c} = \frac{\frac{At^{2}}{2}+constant}{RC+t}

is this right up to this point? how can i solve for the constant?
 
  • #14
I can't seem to remember off the top of my head how to solve this diff'eqn. It's first order non homogeneous. I think you can find it in Boyce and Diprima's textbook. I think it involves integrating factors or something to that extent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K