Equation of a circle from given conditions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Krushnaraj Pandya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Conditions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the equation of a circle that passes through the points (1,2) and (3,4) while also being tangent to the line represented by the equation 3x + y - 3 = 0. The participants analyze the general equation of a circle, x² + y² + 2gx + 2fy + c = 0, and derive relationships between the circle's center and the given points. They conclude that the method of using the midpoint and perpendicular slopes does not yield a unique solution due to insufficient equations for the three variables involved, necessitating the use of the tangential condition for a complete solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the general equation of a circle: x² + y² + 2gx + 2fy + c = 0
  • Knowledge of coordinate geometry, specifically the concept of tangents and distances from points to lines
  • Familiarity with the concept of perpendicular bisectors in geometry
  • Ability to solve systems of equations involving multiple variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method for calculating the distance from a point to a line in analytic geometry
  • Learn about the properties of tangents to circles and their relationship with circle equations
  • Explore the concept of minimizing distances in geometric problems
  • Investigate alternative methods for solving circle equations with multiple conditions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focused on analytic geometry, as well as anyone interested in solving complex geometric problems involving circles and tangents.

Krushnaraj Pandya
Gold Member
Messages
697
Reaction score
73

Homework Statement


Equation of the circle passing through the point (1,2) and (3,4) and touching the line 3x+y-3=0 is?

Homework Equations


x^2+y^2+2gx+2fy+c=0...(1)
(-g,-f)=center of circle
sqrt(g^2+f^2-c)=radius...(2)

The Attempt at a Solution


Putting (1,2) and (3,4) in equation 1 we get 5+2g+4f+c=0; 25+6g+8f+c=0.
Now, line joining the two points will be perpendicular to the line joining center and midpoint of that line (chord perpendicular to radius). Say (h,k) is center, slope joining the two points is 1 so slope of radius through midpoint is -1 (perpendicular lines), midpoint of chord is (2,3); equating -1 to slope of (h,k) and (2,3) gives us k+h=5- but h= -g and k= -f; so -g-f=5 Solving these three equations gives c=40, f= -35/2 and g= 25/2 which is the wrong circle. I know there are other ways to solve this but I want to know why this method is not working in particular- I double checked all the calculations and I can't figure out anything wrong with my logic, Thank you for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is unclear to me what you are trying to do with this ”method”. Why are you creating a line from the centre to the midpoint? You have already used that the two points need to be on the circle and there are an infinite number of circles satisfying this. You cannot squeeze more information out of those two points. You need to use the third requirement.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
so -g-f=5 Solving these three equations gives c=40, f= -35/2 and g= 25/2
Also note that your equation in bold here is not a new equation. You can get it by just using your previous two so there is no new information. Your equation system therefore does not have a unique solution (two equations for three variables) and you need to use the extra information provided.
 
Orodruin said:
It is unclear to me what you are trying to do with this ”method”. Why are you creating a line from the centre to the midpoint? You have already used that the two points need to be on the circle and there are an infinite number of circles satisfying this. You cannot squeeze more information out of those two points. You need to use the third requirement.
Oh, right. I just realized that- sort of like writing a third KVL equation which is the same. To use the third condition I'd have to put the radius=distance of line from center which is lengthy and prone to mistakes in an exam. I was hoping to find a shorter method but I suppose this is the only way to do it...
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Orodruin said:
Also note that your equation in bold here is not a new equation. You can get it by just using your previous two so there is no new information. Your equation system therefore does not have a unique solution (two equations for three variables) and you need to use the extra information provided.
Thank you very much for your help :D
 
$$(x-a)^2+(y-(5-a))^2=r^2 $$ Minimise for tangent: $$2(x-a)+2(y-(5-a))\frac{dy}{dx}=0 $$ with $$ y=3-3x \Rightarrow \frac{dy}{dx}=-3$$ Interesting problem - you end up with two values of a and hence two circles satisfying the given conditions.
 
neilparker62 said:
$$(x-a)^2+(y-(5-a))^2=r^2 $$ Minimise for tangent: $$2(x-a)+2(y-(5-a))\frac{dy}{dx}=0 $$ with $$ y=3-3x \Rightarrow \frac{dy}{dx}=-3$$ Interesting problem - you end up with two values of a and hence two circles satisfying the given conditions.
how did you obtain coordinates of center as (a,5-a)?
 
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
how did you obtain coordinates of center as (a,5-a)?
From equation of perpendicular bisector of the line drawn between the two given points.
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS
neilparker62 said:
From equation of perpendicular bisector of the line drawn between the two given points.
ohh, really good solution- how did you think of this?
 
  • #10
Other approaches seemed to be heading for complications so I tried to keep it simple! I wasn't quite sure how to use the information about the tangent line until I realized the problem was essentially one of minimising distance between point (the circle centre) and line (y=3-3x).
 
  • #11
neilparker62 said:
Other approaches seemed to be heading for complications so I tried to keep it simple! I wasn't quite sure how to use the information about the tangent line until I realized the problem was essentially one of minimising distance between point (the circle centre) and line (y=3-3x).
Great! Thank you very much for your help.
 
  • #12
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
ohh, really good solution- how did you think of this?
A pleasure. Thanks for your kind compliment - the problem was certainly a little different from 'run of the mill' exercises in analytic geometry.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
841
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K