All the derivation of the equation of line on complex plane uses the fact that (x,y) \in R^2 can be identified with x+iy \in C.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Thus, they begin with ax+by+c = 0 then re-write x = (z+\bar{z})/2 and y = (z-\bar{z})/(2i), and substitute it into real plane line equation to get it in complex form.

What I don't quite understand is, since (x,y) is identified with (x,iy),

don't we need to write ax+by+c=0 into ax+biy+c=0 before we proceed with the substitution? Why don't we need to do such thing?

Thank you.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Equation of a line in complex plane

Loading...

Similar Threads - Equation line complex | Date |
---|---|

A Hahn-Banach From Systems of Linear Equations | Sep 16, 2017 |

I Complex Analysis Harmonic functions | Nov 7, 2016 |

Second derivatives of magnetic potential | Feb 23, 2016 |

Commutations and delta in deriving Ampère's law | Feb 19, 2016 |

Help finding the equation of a line to a moving point | Sep 10, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**