Equation of state of a hard sphere gas

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 9K views
apj
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am trying to solve problem 1.4 from Statistical Mechanics by R.K. Pathria 2nd edition. This is the problem:
In a classical gas of hard spheres (of diameter [tex]\sigma[/tex]), the spatial distribution of the particles is no longer uncorrelated. Rougly speaking, the presence of [tex]n[/tex] particles in the system leaves only a volume [tex](V-nv_0)[/tex] available for the (n+1)th particle; clearly, [tex]v_0[/tex] would be proportional to [tex]\sigma^3[/tex]. Assuming that [tex]Nv_0 \ll V[/tex], determine the dependence of [tex]\Omega(N, V, E)[/tex] on V {For an ideal gas this would be [tex]\Omega \propto V^N[/tex]} and show that, as a result of this, V in the gas law (PV=nRT) gets replaced by (V-b), where b is four times the actual space occupied by the particles.


2. The attempt at a solution
I first tried:
[tex]\Omega(N, E, V) \propto (V-Nv_0)^N[/tex]
and then:
[tex] \frac{P}{T} = \left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial V} \right)_{N,E} = \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial V} k_B \ln \Omega(N, E, V) \right)_{N,E} = k_B \frac{N}{(V-Nv_0)}[/tex],
rearranging yields
[tex] P(V-Nv_0) = k_B N T[/tex]
which looks a lot like what I need to prove, however I did not prove the factor 4.


A second guess was more like a hand waving argument. Suppose two hard spheres of diameter [tex]\sigma[/tex] in close contact. Together they occupy a space twice the volume of a sphere of diameter [tex]\sigma[/tex]:

[tex] \frac{4}{3} \pi \left( \frac{\sigma}{2} \right)^3 = \frac{1}{3} \pi \sigma^3[/tex],
but they exclude a volume of a sphere of diameter [tex]2 \sigma[/tex]:
[tex] \frac{4}{3} \pi \sigma^3[/tex]
From here we find the factor 4


Third try:
Probably the best thing to do is to assume the following:
[tex] \Omega \propto \prod_{i=0}^{N-1} (V-iv_0)[/tex]
and then continue from thereon, but I don't know how to do this properly.

Any help would be appreciated greatly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey can you please explain more elaborately how you got the factor of 4.