Equations for the velocity of progressive travelling waves

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity Waves
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the wave velocity equation, v = √(T/μ), for progressive traveling waves without relying on dimensional analysis. Participants emphasize the importance of the wave equation, represented as ∂²y/∂t² = v²∂²y/∂x², and apply Newton's second law to a small element of a tensioned string. The derivation confirms that the wave equation allows solutions for traveling waves, demonstrating that the phase velocity is given by v_p = √(T/μ), where T is tension and μ is linear density.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave equations and their forms
  • Familiarity with Newton's second law of motion
  • Knowledge of tension and linear density in strings
  • Basic calculus, particularly partial derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the wave equation in detail
  • Explore the implications of neglecting weight in wave motion
  • Learn about the solutions of the wave equation for different boundary conditions
  • Investigate the relationship between angular frequency (ω) and wave number (k) in wave mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying wave mechanics, as well as educators looking to enhance their understanding of wave propagation in tensioned strings.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
All below
Relevant Equations
All below
Someone know how to derive v = √(T/μ) for waves traveling? (without being by dimensional analyse)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look into the wave equation, ##\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2} = v^2\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}##. The classic way of deriving this for a transverse wave on a tensioned string is to consider a small element like this

1595067442127.png


such that the tensions on either end are approximately equal, and both angles are small. The linear density of string is ##\mu##, although as it happens it is easier, at least first off, to neglect the contribution of the weight of the element to the resultant force. Try to apply Newton's second law in the vertical direction!

N.B. you might wonder what would happen if we don't neglect the weight. Actually, nothing much, except the wave equation now contains a constant source term.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
etotheipi said:
Look into the wave equation, ##\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2} = v^2\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}##. The classic way of deriving this for a transverse wave on a tensioned string is to consider a small element like this

View attachment 266517

such that the tensions on either end are approximately equal, and both angles are small. The linear density of string is ##\mu##, although as it happens it is easier, at least first off, to neglect the contribution of the weight of the element to the resultant force. Try to apply Newton's second law in the vertical direction!

N.B. you might wonder what would happen if we don't neglect the weight. Actually, nothing much, except the wave equation now contains a constant source term.

I see what you want yo say, we will get:
##\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2} = T/μ\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}##

The problem is exactly this, we just pick T/μ and assume as the ##v^2##

We just assume it by the dimensional analyse
 
Okay, let's run it through first, $$T\sin{\theta_2} - T\sin{\theta_1} \approx T\left[ \tan{\theta_2} - \tan{\theta_1} \right] = (\mu dx) \frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2}$$Since ##\tan{\theta} = \frac{\partial y}{\partial x}##,$$T[\tan{\theta_2} - \tan{\theta_1}] = T\left[\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2} dx \right] = \mu dx \frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2}$$ $$\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2} = \frac{T}{\mu} \frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}$$as you inferred. But notice that this differential permits solutions of traveling waves of the form$$y(x,t) = A\sin{(kx - \omega t + \phi)}$$with a phase velocity of ##v_p = \sqrt{\frac{T}{\mu}} = \frac{\omega}{k}##. There is no need for any dimensional methods, or the like!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K