Equations for the velocity of progressive travelling waves

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity Waves
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the wave velocity equation v = √(T/μ) for transverse waves on a tensioned string, emphasizing the application of Newton's second law in the vertical direction. Participants clarify that by considering a small element of the string and approximating the tensions at either end, one can arrive at the wave equation, which is expressed as ∂²y/∂t² = (T/μ)∂²y/∂x². The derivation shows that neglecting the weight of the element simplifies the analysis, although including it introduces a constant source term without significantly altering the fundamental wave behavior. The resulting differential equation allows for solutions representing traveling waves, confirming that dimensional analysis is unnecessary for this derivation. The discussion concludes that the phase velocity of the wave can be directly obtained from the derived equation.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
All below
Relevant Equations
All below
Someone know how to derive v = √(T/μ) for waves traveling? (without being by dimensional analyse)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look into the wave equation, ##\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2} = v^2\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}##. The classic way of deriving this for a transverse wave on a tensioned string is to consider a small element like this

1595067442127.png


such that the tensions on either end are approximately equal, and both angles are small. The linear density of string is ##\mu##, although as it happens it is easier, at least first off, to neglect the contribution of the weight of the element to the resultant force. Try to apply Newton's second law in the vertical direction!

N.B. you might wonder what would happen if we don't neglect the weight. Actually, nothing much, except the wave equation now contains a constant source term.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes berkeman
etotheipi said:
Look into the wave equation, ##\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2} = v^2\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}##. The classic way of deriving this for a transverse wave on a tensioned string is to consider a small element like this

View attachment 266517

such that the tensions on either end are approximately equal, and both angles are small. The linear density of string is ##\mu##, although as it happens it is easier, at least first off, to neglect the contribution of the weight of the element to the resultant force. Try to apply Newton's second law in the vertical direction!

N.B. you might wonder what would happen if we don't neglect the weight. Actually, nothing much, except the wave equation now contains a constant source term.

I see what you want yo say, we will get:
##\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2} = T/μ\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}##

The problem is exactly this, we just pick T/μ and assume as the ##v^2##

We just assume it by the dimensional analyse
 
Okay, let's run it through first, $$T\sin{\theta_2} - T\sin{\theta_1} \approx T\left[ \tan{\theta_2} - \tan{\theta_1} \right] = (\mu dx) \frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2}$$Since ##\tan{\theta} = \frac{\partial y}{\partial x}##,$$T[\tan{\theta_2} - \tan{\theta_1}] = T\left[\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2} dx \right] = \mu dx \frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2}$$ $$\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2} = \frac{T}{\mu} \frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}$$as you inferred. But notice that this differential permits solutions of traveling waves of the form$$y(x,t) = A\sin{(kx - \omega t + \phi)}$$with a phase velocity of ##v_p = \sqrt{\frac{T}{\mu}} = \frac{\omega}{k}##. There is no need for any dimensional methods, or the like!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K