Equilibrium and Center of Gravity problem

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics lab problem involving the calculation of tension in a tendon when the leg is extended at specific angles. The participant has identified forces acting on the lower leg, including gravity and the weight of the foot, but struggles with the torque equilibrium due to a lack of distance measurements. It is suggested that the length of the leg can be canceled out in the torque equation, allowing for a focus on the tension as the only unknown. By taking moments about the knee, the participant can simplify the problem and find the tension without needing additional distances. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding torque and equilibrium in solving the problem effectively.
p0ke
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm having some trouble finding a definitive answer for this problem of my physics lab.

The large quadricep muscles in the upper leg terminate at the lower end in a tendon attached to the upper end of the tibia. The force on the lower leg when the leg is extended are modeled below (attached jpg), where T is the tension in the tendon, w is the force of gravity acting on the lower leg, and F is the weight of the foot. Find T when the tendon is at an angle of 20 degrees with the tibia, assuming that w = 180N, F = 30.0 N, and the leg is extended at an angle of 45.0 degrees with the vertical. Assume that the center of gravity of the lower leg is at its center, and that the tendon attaches to the lower leg at a point one fifth of the way down the leg.

I've been looking through some examples to try to come up with a general idea, but this problem seems somewhat different as no lengths or distances are given except that the tendon attaches 1/5 down the leg. So far, I've found forces in x and y components to get

SUMFx = Tx + wx + Fx = 0
to get Tx = 0.
Then in y direction, I'm not sure if i can do this but i found
Tsin65 - 180 - 30 = 0
to get T = 231.7.

Knowing that this is supposed to be a torque-related problem I also used SUMt = tT + tw + tF = 0. Then tT = rTTsinθ. This is where I am stuck. How would I use the torque equilibrium equation if I am not given any distances? Any hints or suggestions would be really helpful!
 

Attachments

  • equilibrium.JPG
    equilibrium.JPG
    5.1 KB · Views: 530
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF p0ke.

The length of the leg will appear in the calculation of all three torques. So you can cancel it out in "the sum of the torques = to zero". You can then take moments about the knee (pivot point) taking l as the length of the tibia, which then cancels in the equation. The only unknown in the torque equation will then be the tension in the muscle. So you only need to consider this equation. There will also be a reaction force at the knee acting on the tibia, which need not be included in the torque equation if you take the torques about the knee.
 
Last edited:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K