Equilibrium of a Rigid Body: Balancing Forces and Moments

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the equilibrium of two masses (M and m) connected by a massless rod on a frictionless slope, focusing on balancing forces and moments. Participants explore the gravitational forces acting on each mass and the role of tension in the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the components of gravitational forces on the masses and the necessity of considering the tension in the rod. There are inquiries about the proper representation of forces in free-body diagrams and the relationship between forces and angles. Some participants suggest resolving forces parallel to the slope and drawing separate diagrams for each mass.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on drawing free-body diagrams and resolving forces. There is an emphasis on ensuring clarity in labeling forces and equations. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the balance of moments and the role of potential energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of accurately representing angles and forces in diagrams, as well as the need to clarify assumptions about the system's setup. There is a mention of potential confusion regarding the use of terms like cos(L) and sin(L) when L is a length, indicating a need for careful consideration of definitions.

bbal
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
We have two masses (M and m) , which are conncected with a massless rod with a length L and placed on a frictionless slope. Find the equilibrium with respect to Φ(horizontal angle).
Relevant Equations
τ=rxF
Components of gravitational force on M: normal force:M*g*cos(90-α)M*g*sin(α)
Downhill force: M*g*sin(90-α)=M*g*cos(α)

On m: normal force: m*g*cos(α)
Downhill force: m*g*sin(α)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20210121_100457.jpg
    IMG_20210121_100457.jpg
    27.3 KB · Views: 207
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the third force, i.e. tension between M and m through rod should be also considered.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics
bbal said:
Homework Statement:: We have two masses (M and m) , which are conncected with a massless rod with a length L and placed on a frictionless slope. Find the equilibrium with respect to Φ(horizontal angle).
Relevant Equations:: τ=rxF

Components of gravitational force on M: normal force:M*g*cos(90-L)=M*g*sin(L)
Downhill force: M*g*sin(90-L)=M*g*cos(L)

On m: normal force: m*g*cos(L)
Downhill force: m*g*sin(L)
Can you write terms such as cos(L) and sin(L) when 'L' (on your diagram) is a length?

To emphasise what @anuttarasammyak said, does the rod exert a force on each mass?

Have you drawn the free-body diagrams for each mass ?
 
Steve4Physics said:
Can you write terms such as cos(L) and sin(L) when 'L' (on your diagram) is a length?

To emphasise what @anuttarasammyak said, does the rod exert a force on each mass?

Have you drawn the free-body diagrams for each mass ?
Thank you for pointing out the mistake. Yes, the rod does exert force on the masses. I drew one, but I only included the components the gravitational force.
 
find critical points of the potential energy ##V=V(\phi),\quad V'(\phi)=0##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bbal
bbal said:
I drew one, but I only included the components the gravitational force.
I'd draw *two* free body diagrams (not "one") - one for each mass. Each diagram should show all (3) forces (not components) acting on the mass, or it's not a free body diagram. It will help you if you include the angles between each each force and the plane.

Once you have your two diagrams, resolve parallel to the plane for each mass. This gives you two equations. If you post your diagrams and/or equations we can check them for you.

From the two equations it's not difficult to get Φ.

You can also do it as suggested by @wrobel using potential energy. But post some working for us to see or we can't help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bbal
I came up with this I hope you can read it. As far as the one with potential is concerned, I'm still thinking about how to start that one.
 

Attachments

  • 16112546485504782101814348372358.jpg
    16112546485504782101814348372358.jpg
    30.4 KB · Views: 146
Last edited:
bbal said:
I hope you can read it
A forlorn hope, I fear.
Try again, using a darker pen.
Just draw one mass and label the forces on it. Use labels that index that mass, like ##F_{g1}## for gravitational force on mass 1. That way you can later write equations indexing the other mass and we will all know what you mean without needing another diagram.
Don't write expressions for the forces (m1g cos etc.) on the diagram. Type the equations for those into the post, like ##F_{g1}=...##.

See if you can go beyond that, writing equations that relate the forces.
 
bbal said:
I came up with this I hope you can read it. As far as the one with potential is concerned, I'm still thinking about how to start that one.
Based on the relevant equation shown in the OP, the forces that you should be concerned with are those perpendicular to the massless rod.

If the rod is in horizontal position, a clockwise moment will exist, due to the perpendicular force Mg being greater than force mg.

Therefore, the rod will naturally adopt a unique angle at which both perpendicular forces become equal and a balance of moments is achieved.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bbal

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K