Equilibrium of a Rigid Body: Balancing Forces and Moments

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the equilibrium of two masses (M and m) connected by a massless rod on a frictionless slope, analyzing the forces and moments acting on each mass. Key equations include the gravitational force components, normal forces, and the torque equation τ=rxF. Participants emphasize the importance of drawing separate free-body diagrams for each mass to accurately resolve forces and moments, ultimately leading to the determination of the angle Φ at which equilibrium is achieved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational force components
  • Knowledge of torque and equilibrium concepts
  • Ability to draw and interpret free-body diagrams
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions (sine and cosine)
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to construct and analyze free-body diagrams for multiple bodies
  • Study the principles of torque and rotational equilibrium
  • Explore potential energy concepts in mechanical systems
  • Investigate the effects of tension in connected systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone studying dynamics and equilibrium in rigid body systems will benefit from this discussion.

bbal
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
We have two masses (M and m) , which are conncected with a massless rod with a length L and placed on a frictionless slope. Find the equilibrium with respect to Φ(horizontal angle).
Relevant Equations
τ=rxF
Components of gravitational force on M: normal force:M*g*cos(90-α)M*g*sin(α)
Downhill force: M*g*sin(90-α)=M*g*cos(α)

On m: normal force: m*g*cos(α)
Downhill force: m*g*sin(α)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20210121_100457.jpg
    IMG_20210121_100457.jpg
    27.3 KB · Views: 197
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the third force, i.e. tension between M and m through rod should be also considered.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics
bbal said:
Homework Statement:: We have two masses (M and m) , which are conncected with a massless rod with a length L and placed on a frictionless slope. Find the equilibrium with respect to Φ(horizontal angle).
Relevant Equations:: τ=rxF

Components of gravitational force on M: normal force:M*g*cos(90-L)=M*g*sin(L)
Downhill force: M*g*sin(90-L)=M*g*cos(L)

On m: normal force: m*g*cos(L)
Downhill force: m*g*sin(L)
Can you write terms such as cos(L) and sin(L) when 'L' (on your diagram) is a length?

To emphasise what @anuttarasammyak said, does the rod exert a force on each mass?

Have you drawn the free-body diagrams for each mass ?
 
Steve4Physics said:
Can you write terms such as cos(L) and sin(L) when 'L' (on your diagram) is a length?

To emphasise what @anuttarasammyak said, does the rod exert a force on each mass?

Have you drawn the free-body diagrams for each mass ?
Thank you for pointing out the mistake. Yes, the rod does exert force on the masses. I drew one, but I only included the components the gravitational force.
 
find critical points of the potential energy ##V=V(\phi),\quad V'(\phi)=0##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bbal
bbal said:
I drew one, but I only included the components the gravitational force.
I'd draw *two* free body diagrams (not "one") - one for each mass. Each diagram should show all (3) forces (not components) acting on the mass, or it's not a free body diagram. It will help you if you include the angles between each each force and the plane.

Once you have your two diagrams, resolve parallel to the plane for each mass. This gives you two equations. If you post your diagrams and/or equations we can check them for you.

From the two equations it's not difficult to get Φ.

You can also do it as suggested by @wrobel using potential energy. But post some working for us to see or we can't help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bbal
I came up with this I hope you can read it. As far as the one with potential is concerned, I'm still thinking about how to start that one.
 

Attachments

  • 16112546485504782101814348372358.jpg
    16112546485504782101814348372358.jpg
    30.4 KB · Views: 137
Last edited:
bbal said:
I hope you can read it
A forlorn hope, I fear.
Try again, using a darker pen.
Just draw one mass and label the forces on it. Use labels that index that mass, like ##F_{g1}## for gravitational force on mass 1. That way you can later write equations indexing the other mass and we will all know what you mean without needing another diagram.
Don't write expressions for the forces (m1g cos etc.) on the diagram. Type the equations for those into the post, like ##F_{g1}=...##.

See if you can go beyond that, writing equations that relate the forces.
 
bbal said:
I came up with this I hope you can read it. As far as the one with potential is concerned, I'm still thinking about how to start that one.
Based on the relevant equation shown in the OP, the forces that you should be concerned with are those perpendicular to the massless rod.

If the rod is in horizontal position, a clockwise moment will exist, due to the perpendicular force Mg being greater than force mg.

Therefore, the rod will naturally adopt a unique angle at which both perpendicular forces become equal and a balance of moments is achieved.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bbal

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
868
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
928
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K