Equipartition's energy theorem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Talker1500
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the applicability of the equipartition's energy theorem in various Hamiltonian systems, specifically questioning its validity beyond the standard case of H=p²/2m, which yields 3/2KT in three dimensions. Participants confirm that the theorem is valid for potential-free systems and can be applied to harmonic potentials at high temperatures. The conversation also highlights the existence of a more general equipartition theorem that extends its applicability to more complex Hamiltonians, such as H=|p|c and H=p⁴.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical statistical mechanics
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Knowledge of the equipartition theorem
  • Basic concepts of potential energy in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Virial Theorem and its implications in statistical mechanics
  • Explore the general equipartition theorem and its applications
  • Study the specific heats of solids in the harmonic approximation
  • Investigate the derivation of equipartition in one-dimensional systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, statistical mechanics, and thermodynamics, will benefit from this discussion.

Talker1500
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm reading about the equipartition's energy theorem (classical statistics), and I was wondering about its validity when applied to different hamiltonians.

The usual case, H=p ^2/2m, it yields 3/2KT in 3D, but what about more complicated H? Like H=|p|c, or a H with a complex V? would the theorem still be available for use?

Thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
Equipartition of energy is only valid for a potential free system.

Beyond that you may want to look up the Virial Theorem
 
In 1-D is isn't too hard to derive the result for the cases H = |p|, or H = p^4. The derivation closely follows that of the quadratic case. In 3-D I suspect it is much more complicated, but I am often wrong!

jason
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
759
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K