I Equipment for simple spectrometer

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around building a simple spectrometer, with a focus on whether to use anti-reflective coated lenses or standard lenses. Participants emphasize the need for clarity on the desired spectrum and specifications of the spectrometer, including the use of sensors and diffraction gratings. There is a consensus that a basic setup typically involves a diffraction grating in a tube, but the original poster's mention of lenses suggests a more complex design. The conversation highlights the importance of providing detailed information to receive effective guidance. Overall, the thread underscores the necessity of clear communication in technical discussions about spectrometer construction.
hagopbul
Messages
397
Reaction score
45
TL;DR
Spectrometer standard equipment
Hello:

Doing some review work on physics and , trying to build some simple spectrometer, is it possible to use anti reflect coated lenses or should I use normal lenses

Best regards
H
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What spectrum, wavelength range ?
 
Why do you want lenses at all?
Again, you are assuming we can read your mind.
 
Baluncore said:
What spectrum, wavelength range ?
Visible range

Vanadium 50 said:
Why do you want lenses at all?
Again, you are assuming we can read your mind.
To reduce the size of the light reaching the sensor to enhance the quality
 
Ah...so now there is more than a diffraction grating and a tube. There is some kind of sensor.

We're back where we were "Figure out what I want and then tell me how to build it."
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE and Baluncore
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
Thread is reopened provisionally, but unfortunately the OP is on a short vacation from PF.

@hagopbul -- If you would like our help in this thread, you need to give us specifications on the spectrometer you want to build, and show us what you have been reading about spectrometers so we can try to offer helpful suggestions. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Sadly, I don't think there's been any more thought to it than the Little Rascal's "Hey, let's put on a show!"

The simplest is a diffraction grating in a tube. Zillions have been sold as part of chemistry sets when chemistry sets were a thing. That's clearly not what he wants, as he discusses lenses (which is almost certainly not what he wants based on his description) and sensors. If this is inadequate, he has to tell us where and not rely on our telepathic powers.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and berkeman
Vanadium 50 said:
Sadly, I don't think there's been any more thought to it than the Little Rascal's "Hey, let's put on a show!"

The simplest is a diffraction grating in a tube. Zillions have been sold as part of chemistry sets when chemistry sets were a thing. That's clearly not what he wants, as he discusses lenses (which is almost certainly not what he wants based on his description) and sensors. If this is inadequate, he has to tell us where and not rely on our telepathic powers.
Well, I have at least learned something from your reply, even from the question. It never occurred to me I could have a simple spectrometer. For the next comment, can you explain to me what I will use it for? =;-D [No reply needed. How you folks have such relatively kindly replies often feels beyond me, but thanks to your examples I do find it within me to try.]
 
  • #10
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
  • #11
After an off-topic reply has been deleted, the thread is reopened provisionally.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K