Equivalence of Euler-Lagrange equations and Cardinal Equations for a rigid planar system

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the equivalence of Euler-Lagrange equations and cardinal equations for a rigid planar system, focusing on the kinetic energy expression and the derivation of equations of motion. Participants explore the relationships between different formulations of the problem, including the use of Lagrangian mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the Euler-Lagrange equations from a kinetic energy expression and compares them to cardinal equations for conservation laws. They question whether their methodology or assumptions about the variables involved might be flawed.
  • Some participants suggest alternative variable definitions and formulations for the Lagrangian, indicating potential complexities in the original approach.
  • Questions arise regarding the relationship between the derived equations and the assumptions made about angular velocity and other quantities.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's calculations and providing alternative perspectives on the problem. There is a collaborative effort to clarify the methodology and explore different formulations, though no consensus has been reached on the correctness of the original approach.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the complexity and indirect nature of the variables involved, suggesting that this may contribute to the difficulties in deriving the equations correctly. The discussion also highlights the importance of checking assumptions related to the kinetic energy and angular momentum in the context of the problem.

l4teLearner
Messages
19
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Check the equivalence of cardinal equations w.r.t Euler-Lagrange equations for a simple rigid planar system of a rod freely moving in space.

Consider the system depicted in the figure (see solution attempt) where a (thin) uniform rod of mass ##m## and length ##l## (section of the rod is negligible) is freely moving in two dimensional space. Given the lagrangian coordinates ##r##, ##\varphi## and ##\psi## shown in the picture, calculate the equations of motion for the body using Lagrange-Euler equations, then using the cardinal equations and finally compare the result. The two descriptions must be equivalent.
Relevant Equations
Koenig theorem for the Kinetic energy of a rigid body
$$T=\frac{1}{2}mv_p^2+\frac{1}{2}mI{\omega}^2$$

Euler Lagrange equations
$$L_r=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial \dot r}(L) \right)-\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(L)=0$$
$$L_\varphi=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial \dot \varphi}(L) \right)-\frac{\partial}{\partial \varphi}(L)=0$$
$$L_\psi=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial \dot \psi}(L) \right)-\frac{\partial}{\partial \psi}(L)=0$$

Cardinal equations for a rigid body.
$$C_x=m\frac{dv_x}{dt}=0$$
$$C_y=m\frac{dv_y}{dt}=0$$
$$C_\omega=I\frac{d}{dt}(\omega)=0$$
1000035111.png

I express the total kinetic energy of the body, via König theorem, as

$$T=\frac{1}{2}mv_p^2+\frac{1}{2}mI{\omega}^2$$

where $$v_p=(v_x,v_y)=(\dot{r}\cos\varphi-r\dot{\varphi}\sin\varphi-\frac{l}{2}(\dot\varphi-\dot\psi)\sin(\varphi-\psi),\dot r \sin\varphi+r\dot\varphi \cos\varphi+\frac{l}{2}(\dot\varphi-\dot\psi)\cos(\varphi-\psi))$$ is the velocity of the center of mass, ##\omega=\dot\varphi-\dot\psi## is the angular velocity and ##I=\frac{1}{12}ml^2## is the moment of inertia of the rod with respect to its center of mass.

Doing the calculations (which I double checked with various platforms whose name starts with "M", so I am not sure the problem lies in the calculations) I get

$$T=\frac{1}{2}(\dot r^2+r^2\dot\varphi^2+\frac{l^2}{3}(\dot\varphi-\dot\psi)^2+l(\dot\varphi-\dot\psi)(r\dot\varphi \cos\psi+\dot r \sin\psi))$$

and the following Euler-Lagrange equations

$$L_r=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial \dot r}(L) \right)-\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(L)=m (-2 \dot{\varphi}^2 r + 2 \ddot{r} +l \sin(\psi) (\ddot{\varphi} - \ddot{\psi} ) +l \cos(\psi)(\dot{\varphi}-\dot{\psi})^2 )/2=0$$

$$L_\varphi=\frac{d}{dt} \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial \dot \varphi}(L)\right)-\frac{\partial}{\partial \varphi}(L)=
\frac{m}{3} l^2(\ddot{\varphi} - \ddot{\psi}) +
m l \cos(\psi)\left(\dot{\varphi} \dot{r} + \ddot{\varphi} r - \frac{\ddot{\psi} r}{2}\right)
+ m l \sin(\psi) \left( \frac{\dot{\psi}^2 r}{2} - \dot{\varphi} \dot{\psi} r+ \frac{\ddot{r}}{2} \right) + m\ddot{\varphi} r^2+ 2m\dot{\varphi} \dot{r} r
=0$$

$$L_\psi=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial \dot \psi}(L)\right)-\frac{\partial}{\partial \psi}(L)=
-\frac{m}{3} l^2 (\ddot{\varphi} - \ddot{\psi})- m l \cos(\psi) \left(\dot{r}\dot{\varphi} + \frac{\ddot{\varphi} r}{2}\right) -\frac{m}{2} l \sin(\psi)(\ddot{r}- r \dot{\varphi}^2 )
=0$$

If instead I calculate the cardinal equations, where I indicate quantities as:

- ##C_x=0## for the conservation of linear momentum along the x-axis
- ##C_y=0## for the conservation of linear momentum along the y-axix
- ##C_\omega=0##, for the conservation of angular momentum

I get the following equations:

$$C_x=m\frac{dv_x}{dt}=m(\ddot r \cos \varphi -2 \dot r \dot \varphi \sin \varphi -r \ddot \varphi \sin \varphi -r \dot \varphi^2 \cos \varphi-\frac{l}{2}(\ddot \varphi - \ddot \psi)\sin(\varphi-\psi)-\frac{l}{2}(\dot\varphi-\dot\psi)^2\cos(\varphi-\psi)=0$$

$$C_y=m\frac{dv_y}{dt}=m(\ddot r \sin \varphi + 2 \dot r \dot \varphi \cos \varphi + r \ddot \varphi \cos \varphi -r \dot \varphi^2 \sin \varphi+\frac{l}{2}(\ddot \varphi - \ddot \psi)\cos(\varphi-\psi)-\frac{l}{2}(\dot\varphi-\dot\psi)^2\sin(\varphi-\psi)=0$$

$$C_\omega=I\frac{d}{dt}(\omega)=\frac{1}{12}ml^2\dot\omega=\frac{1}{12}ml^2(\ddot\varphi-\ddot\psi)=0$$

In particular, I do get $$C_x \cos\varphi+C_y \sin\varphi=L_r$$ which seems promising to me, but I cannot find any way to retrieve ##C_\omega## from ##L_r##, ##L_\varphi##, ##L_\psi##.

I need to understand, am I just having an algebraic computation problem here, or is there a flaw in my reasoning? I am not asking to check my calculations, (you are welcome of course if you want) but to check the methodology. Maybe I am making some wrong assumptions on the ##T##, ##C## and ##\omega## quantities?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I observe that x,y coordinates of center of inertia is
(r \cos\phi+\frac{l}{2} \cos \theta, r \sin\phi+\frac{l}{2} \sin \theta)
\omega = \dot{\theta}
where
\theta = \phi - \Psi
I hope it could be your help to check your result.
L(r,\dot{r},\phi,\dot{\phi},\theta,\dot{\theta})=\frac{m}{2}[ \ \dot{r}^2+r^2\dot{\phi}^2+\frac{l^2}{3}\dot{\theta}^2+l\dot{\theta}\cos(\phi-\theta)r\dot{\phi}+l\dot{\theta}\sin(\phi-\theta)\dot{r} \ ]
 
Last edited:
anuttarasammyak said:
I observe that x,y coordinates of center of inertia is
(r \cos\phi+\frac{l}{2} \cos \theta, r \sin\phi+\frac{l}{2} \sin \theta)
\omega = \dot{\theta}
where
\theta = \phi - \psi
I hope it could be your help to check your result.
hi anuttarasammyak, thanks for your help. yes, I evaluated the angular velocity as ##\dot \phi - \dot \psi##, it's one of the formulas I wrote just under the picture, in the first paragraph.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak
I think the variables are complex and indirect. By changing the variables, center of inertia is
(r \cos\phi+\frac{l}{2} \cos \theta, r \sin\phi+\frac{l}{2} \sin \theta)=(R\cos \xi, R\sin\xi)
Lagrangian should be
L(R,\dot{R},\xi,\dot{\xi},\theta,\dot{\theta})=\frac{m}{2}[ \ \dot{R}^2+R^2\dot{\xi}^2+\frac{l^2}{12}\dot{\theta}^2\ ]
where
R=\sqrt{r^2+\frac{l^2}{4}+rl\cos\Psi}
\xi=\tan^{-1}\frac{r \sin\phi+\frac{l}{2} \sin (\phi-\Psi)}{r \cos\phi+\frac{l}{2} \cos(\phi-\Psi)}
\theta=\phi-\Psi
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: l4teLearner
anuttarasammyak said:
I think the variables are complex and indirect. By changing the variables, center of inertia is
(r \cos\phi+\frac{l}{2} \cos \theta, r \sin\phi+\frac{l}{2} \sin \theta)=(R\cos \xi, R\sin\xi)
Lagrangian should be
L(R,\dot{R},\xi,\dot{\xi},\theta,\dot{\theta})=\frac{m}{2}[ \ \dot{R}^2+R^2\dot{\xi}^2+\frac{l^2}{12}\dot{\theta}^2\ ]
where
R=\sqrt{r^2+\frac{l^2}{4}+rl\cos\Psi}
\xi=\tan^{-1}\frac{r \sin\phi+\frac{l}{2} \sin (\phi-\Psi)}{r \cos\phi+\frac{l}{2} \cos(\phi-\Psi)}
\theta=\phi-\Psi
thank you! I will attempt the calculations with the lagrangian that you provided and will let you know.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
864
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
938
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K