Equivalence of prime power decompositions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the equivalence of prime power decompositions in finitely generated abelian groups, specifically showing that if the subgroup T_p is isomorphic to two different decompositions, then the number of components (n = m) and the orders of the components (s_i = r_i for all i) must be equal. The proof strategy involves establishing that r_1 = s_1 first, followed by an induction argument to extend this equality to all components. The isomorphism phi plays a crucial role in relating the generators of the groups involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finitely generated abelian groups
  • Knowledge of group isomorphisms and their properties
  • Familiarity with prime power decomposition
  • Induction proofs in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the structure theorem for finitely generated abelian groups
  • Learn about group homomorphisms and isomorphisms
  • Explore induction techniques in mathematical proofs
  • Investigate the properties of cyclic groups and their generators
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, particularly those specializing in abstract algebra, as well as students tackling advanced group theory concepts related to finitely generated abelian groups and their decompositions.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Let G be a finitely generated abelian group and let T_p be the subgroup of all elements having order some power of a prime p. Suppose



T_p \simeq \mathbb{Z}_{p^{r_1}} \times \mathbb{Z}_{p^{r_2}} \times \cdots \times \mathbb{Z}_{p^{r_m }} \simeq \mathbb{Z}_{p^{s_1}} \times \mathbb{Z}_{p^{s_2}} \times \cdots \times \mathbb{Z}_{p^{s_m }

where 1 \leq r_1 \leq \cdots \leq r_m and similarly for the s_i.

Prove that n = m and s_i = r_i for all i. Hint: first prove r_1 = s_1 and then use induction.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I can prove that n = m.

Let phi be the isomorphism from the middle group to the right hand group in the line above. Under phi, the generator of \mathbb{Z}_{p^{r_1}} needs to generate a copy of \mathbb{Z}_{p^{r_1}} in the group on the RHS and similarly the generator of \mathbb{Z}_{p^{s_1}} needs to generate a copy of that group under phi^{-1}, but that doesn't really prove that r_1 = s_1. How can you really use the fact that r_i and s_i are minimal? How can you say anything about the factorization just knowing that e.g the right hand group contains a copy of \mathbb{Z}_{p^{r_1}}?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
 
please?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K