Equivalence Relations and Counter Examples for Equinumerous Sets

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on equivalence relations and counterexamples for equinumerous sets, specifically using sets A, B, C, and D. The participants demonstrate bijections between infinite sets A and B, and finite sets C and D, concluding that while A is equinumerous to B, C cannot be equinumerous to D due to differing cardinalities. Counterexamples are provided to illustrate these concepts, emphasizing the importance of cardinality in establishing bijections.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bijections and equivalence relations
  • Familiarity with set theory concepts such as cardinality
  • Knowledge of Cartesian products of sets
  • Basic grasp of finite and infinite sets
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of bijections in set theory
  • Learn about cardinality and its implications in set theory
  • Explore simpler counterexamples for equivalence relations
  • Investigate transitivity in equivalence relations and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of set theory, and anyone interested in understanding equivalence relations and cardinality in mathematics.

issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Homework Statement
(a) Suppose ##A\thicksim B## and ##A\times C \thicksim B\times D##. Must it be the case that ##C \thicksim D## ?
(b)Suppose ##A\thicksim B##, and ##A## and ##C## are disjoint, ##B## and ##D## are disjoint, and ##A \cup C \thicksim B \cup D ##. Must it be the case that ##C \thicksim D## ?
Relevant Equations
Definition of equinumerous sets
(a) I present the following counter example for this. Let ##A = \{0,1,2,\ldots \}## and ##B = \{ 2,4,6, \ldots \} ##. Also, let ##C = \{ 1, 2 \} ## and ##D = \{3 \}##. Now, we can form a bijection ##f: A \longrightarrow B## between ##A## and ##B## as follows. If ##f(x) = 2x + 2##, we can see that this is a bijection from ##A## to ##B##. So, ##A## and ##B## are equinumerous and so we have ##A \thicksim B ##. Now, we have the Cartesian products

$$ A \times C =\big \{(0,1), (0,2), (1,1), (1,2), (2,1), (2,2), \ldots \big \} $$
$$ B \times D = \big \{ (2,3), (4,3), (6,3), \ldots \big \} $$

Now, we can define a function from ##A \times C## to ##B \times D ## as follows. Let the mapping be defines as follows.

$$ (0,1) \longrightarrow (2,3) $$
$$ (0,2) \longrightarrow (4,3) $$
$$ (1,1) \longrightarrow (6,3) $$
$$ (1,2) \longrightarrow (8,3) $$

and so on. From this mapping, it can be seen that this mapping from ##A \times C## to ##B \times D ## is a bijection. So, we have ##A\times C \thicksim B\times D##. But ##C = \{ 1, 2 \} ## and ##D = \{3 \}## and since the cardinality is different for these finite sets, we can not have a bijection from ##C## to ##D##. So, its not true that ##C \thicksim D## .

(b) Here also, I will present the following counter example. Let ##A = \big \{ 0, 10, 20, \ldots \big \} ## , ##B = \big \{ 5, 15, 25, \ldots \big \}##, ##C = \big \{ 1,2 \big \}## and ## D = \big \{6 \big \} ##. Now we have a function ##g: A \longrightarrow B## defined as follows. ## g(x) = x+5##. We can see that this is a bijection, so we have ##A\thicksim B##. It can also be seen that ##A \bigcap C =\varnothing ## and ##B \bigcap D = \varnothing ##. Now, we also have following unions

$$ A \bigcup C = \big \{ 0, 1, 2, 10, 20, \ldots \big \} $$
$$ B \bigcup D = \big \{ 5, 6, 15, 25, \ldots \big \} $$

Let's define the following relation ##h## from ##A \bigcup C## to ##B \bigcup D ##.

$$ h = \big \{ (0,5), (1,6), (2,15), (10, 25), \ldots \big \} $$

We can see that this is a bijection from ##A \bigcup C## to ##B \bigcup D ##. So, we have ## A \bigcup C \thicksim B \bigcup D ##. So, all the conditions given in the problem are satisfied. Now we have ##C = \{ 1, 2 \} ## and ##D = \{3 \}##. Again, these are finite sets with different cardinality. So, we can not have a bijection from ##C = \{ 1, 2 \} ## to ##D = \{3 \}##. So again, its not true that ##C \thicksim D##.
Do you think the reasoning is valid here ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks good to me. I think, however, there are simpler counterexamples.
 
Thanks PeroK. Can you come up with simpler counterexample ?
 
IssacNewton said:
Thanks PeroK. Can you come up with simpler counterexample ?

One idea is to use the transitivity of ##\thicksim## to show that your sets are both countable (equivalent to ##\mathbb{N}##, rather than directly to each other.

Also, using ##A = B## in both cases would simplify things.

For b), for example, you could have ##A = B = \{3, 4, 5 \dots \}##, ##C = \{1, 2 \}##, ##D = \{2 \}##.

Or, perhaps even simpler, ##C = \{1 \}##, ##D = \emptyset##.
 
Last edited:
Yes, that's indeed very simple. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K