Equivalent Capacitance of Complex Circuit

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the equivalent capacitance of a complex circuit involving capacitors, with a focus on symmetry and potential differences across components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of symmetry in the circuit and question the significance of different capacitor values. There is also discussion about the effects of turning the circuit upside down and the voltage across specific capacitors.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on using symmetry to simplify the circuit analysis, while others are questioning the validity of their approaches and considering alternative scenarios, such as asymmetrical circuits. There is a mix of agreement on certain methods, but no explicit consensus on all aspects of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the potential need for Kirchhoff's Laws and the challenges posed by the complexity of the circuit, indicating that assumptions about symmetry may not hold in all cases.

megaspazz
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine the equivalent capacitance of the combination
shown in Figure P26.75. Suggestion: Consider the symmetry
involved.
prob-26-75.png


Homework Equations



Parallel is: C1+C2+C3+...
Series is: (C1^-1 + C2^-1 + C3^-1 + ...)^-1
q = CV

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea how to do it for a complex circuit. I think it might have something to do with Kirchhoff's Law, but the book never mentioned it and neither did the professor, so I'm thinking it can do it without. And I am not sure what "the symmetry involved" is supposed to mean.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you see any change if you turn the figure upside down?
Is there any reason that both "C" capacitors are different or the both 2C capacitors are?

If they are equivalent, so is the charge and voltage across them.What is the voltage across the 3C capacitor then?

ehild
 
ehild, thank you so much! Since the voltage across it is zero, it's like the 3C capacitor isn't there, right?

Solving the simple circuit then gives 4/3 C, which is the correct answer. Is my way of solving it correct? Or did I simply get the right answer the wrong way?

Many thanks!

Also, this isn't a problem I have to do, but what if the circuit were asymmetrical? Then what would you do?
 
Your solution is correct.

It is a very useful trick for symmetric circuits, that we can connect those points which are at the same potential with a single wire, so the points become a single node. Symmetrically equivalent points are at the same potential.

In general problems, you need to apply Kirchhoff's voltage Law and also the equivalent of Current Law, but with charges.

Every capacitor has its own charge, q at one plate and -q on the other plate.
The net charge at a node is zero. When the capacitors are connected in series, they all have the same charge.
And you know the relation between charge and voltage: q=CV.

Set up all equations and solve.

ehild
 
can you do Kirchoff's Law for this problem? How would you take into account the initial part before the loops and the last wire after the loops?
 
Connect a voltage source to the terminals with arbitrary emf E. Write up the equations in term of E, and solve for the whole charge Q on the connected plates.
Te circuit can be représented by an equivalent capacitor connected to the same voltage source and you can apply C(equivalent)=Q/Eehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K