MHB Erfan's question at Yahoo Answers regarding summation of series

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Summation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the summation of series using the method of differences. It begins by demonstrating that r/(r+1)! can be expressed as 1/r! - 1/(r+1)!, which is proven through algebraic manipulation. The first summation, S_n, from 1 to n, is calculated to be 1 - 1/(n+1)!. The second summation, S_infinity, from 1 to infinity, is evaluated by breaking it down into two parts, leading to the conclusion that S_infinity equals 2e - 3. The discussion effectively illustrates the application of series summation techniques in mathematical analysis.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Summation of series ( Method of differences )?

Show that r/(r+1)! = 1/r! - 1/(r+1)! , hence or otherwise , evaluate i) sum of r/(r+1)! from 1 to n

ii) sum of (r+2)/(r+1)! from 1 to infinity
giving your answer to part ii in the terms of e .

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello again Erfan,

First we are asked to show:

$$\frac{r}{(r+1)!}=\frac{1}{r!}-\frac{1}{(r+1)!}$$

There are a couple of ways we could do this:

a) Combine terms on the right side:

$$\frac{1}{r!}-\frac{1}{(r+1)!}=\frac{(r+1)!-r!}{r!(r+1)!}=\frac{r!((r+1)-1)}{r!(r+1)!}=\frac{r}{(r+1)!}$$

b) Add $$0=1-1$$ to the numerator on the left side:

$$\frac{r}{(r+1)!}=\frac{(r+1)-1}{(r+1)!}=\frac{1}{r!}-\frac{1}{(r+1)!}$$

i) We are asked to evaluate:

$$S_n=\sum_{r=1}^n\left(\frac{r}{(r+1)!} \right)$$

Using the result above, we may write:

$$S_n=\sum_{r=1}^n\left(\frac{1}{r!} \right)-\sum_{r=1}^n\left(\frac{1}{(r+1)!} \right)$$

Re-indexing the first sum, we have:

$$S_n=\sum_{r=0}^{n-1}\left(\frac{1}{(r+1)!} \right)-\sum_{r=1}^n\left(\frac{1}{(r+1)!} \right)$$

Pulling off the first term from the first sum and the last term from the second, we will be left with sums having the same indices:

$$S_n=\left(1+\sum_{r=1}^{n-1}\left(\frac{1}{(r+1)!} \right) \right)-\left(\sum_{r=1}^{n-1}\left(\frac{1}{(r+1)!} \right)+\frac{1}{(n+1)!} \right)$$

The sums add to zero, and we are left with:

$$S_n=1-\frac{1}{(n+1)!}$$

ii) We are now asked to evaluate:

$$S_{\infty}=\sum_{r=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{r+2}{(r+1)!} \right)$$

We may rewrite the summand to obtain:

$$S_{\infty}=\sum_{r=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{r}{(r+1)!} \right)+2\sum_{r=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{(r+1)!} \right)$$

Using the result from part i) for the first sum and re-indexing the second sum, there results:

$$S_{\infty}=\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1-\frac{1}{(n+1)!} \right)+2\left(\sum_{r=2}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{r!} \right) \right)$$

Evaluating the limit and rewriting the sum, we find:

$$S_{\infty}=1+2\left(\sum_{r=0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{r!} \right)-2 \right)$$

Using:

$$e=\sum_{r=0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{r!} \right)$$

we now have:

$$S_{\infty}=1+2\left(e-2 \right)=2e-3$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top