Error equation for the balmer series

  • Thread starter Thread starter wahaj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the error in the wavelength (λ) determined by the Bohr model and the Balmer series. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the error analysis method and the presence of λ in their error equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply error analysis to the equation for λ but is uncertain about the role of λ in their calculations. They question whether they have correctly identified the error in the Rydberg constant (R).
  • Some participants suggest substituting values to clarify the equation and recommend a step-by-step approach to resolve the confusion.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's confusion, offering guidance on how to approach the problem. There is an indication of productive direction as they suggest methods for simplifying the equation and performing error analysis.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that the values for nf and ni are discrete and thus have no associated error, while the Rydberg constant has a specified error. This context is important for understanding the parameters involved in the error analysis.

wahaj
Messages
154
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I have to find the error in λ determined by the Bohr model/Balmer series. I am a bit confused with this so I'd like someone to double check my work. I don't know the exact name of this method but basically all you do is take the differential of all the values which have an error to find the error of the determined value.


Homework Equations



[tex]\frac{1}{\lambda} = R (\frac{1}{n^2_f} - \frac{1}{n^2_i} )[/tex]
nf and ni are discreet values so they have no error in them
R is the Rydberg constant and has an error of +-1 in the last digit so
R = (1.097 +- 1 ) * 107 m-1


The Attempt at a Solution


[tex]\frac{1}{\lambda} = R (\frac{1}{n^2_f} - \frac{1}{n^2_i} )[/tex]
[tex]\frac{\delta \lambda}{\lambda^2} = \delta R (\frac{1}{n^2_f} - \frac{1}{n^2_i} )[/tex]
[tex]\delta \lambda = \lambda^2 (\frac{1}{n^2_f} - \frac{1}{n^2_i} ) \delta R[/tex]
The reason I am confused with this is that I am trying to find the error in λ but λ shows up on the right hand side of my error equation. Also did I get the error in R in the right decimal place?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First: replace everything in brackets with 1/K and solve for lambda.
Now find the error on lambda - should clear up your confusion.
 
that works thanks
 
So is the equation supposed to look like as follows: δλ=λ2(1/K)δR? I am so confused.
 
@dab353: welcome to PF;
Take it step-by-step.
Start with the full equation.
Substitute the 1/K in for the brackets... that's just to make it clear.
Solve that equation for lambda.
Do the error analysis like normal.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
928
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
17K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
921