Error in Series Approximations

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Leo Authersh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Series
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of alternating series, specifically focusing on the relationship between the total sum of the series and its partial sums. Participants explore the intuitive reasoning behind the established definition that the error in approximating the sum is bounded by the next term in the series.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that for an alternating series, the difference between the total sum and the nth partial sum is always less than or equal to the (n+1)th term, seeking an intuitive explanation for this property.
  • Another participant suggests that while the definition is interesting, there may be exceptions, noting that in converging alternating series, the sums oscillate around the correct value, with the next term typically overshooting the correct value.
  • A third participant introduces a condition that could affect the accuracy of the error bound, stating that if the absolute value of the (n+1)th term is less than the nth term, the error can be shown to be at most the size of the next term.
  • This participant elaborates on the implications of this condition, explaining how pairs of terms can lead to overestimating or underestimating the limit of the series.
  • A later reply expresses gratitude for the intuitive explanations provided by others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the definition regarding the error in alternating series. While some agree on the general behavior of the sums, others point out potential exceptions and the need for additional conditions to fully understand the error bounds.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the behavior of terms in the series and conditions for convergence are not fully explored, leaving room for further discussion on the implications of these factors.

Leo Authersh
It has been defined that for an alternating series, the difference between the total sum of the series and the partial sum of the series through nth term is always less than or equal to the (n+1)th term. Can anyone explain the intuitive reason behind this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's an interesting "definition" - but there could be exceptions.

For an alternating series of real values that converges, what is most commonly seen is that ending on a "plus" term puts you over the correct value and ending on a "minus" term puts you under the correct value. So you steadily close in on the correct value, but you keep crossing from one side to the other as you add each consecutive term.

Given that scenario, you would know that the next term (N+1) is going to overshoot the correct value - and therefor your current error is less than the absolute value of that term.

For example, consider the series ## \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}V^{n} = 1/{V+1} = V + V^2 + V^3 + ...## where ##0>V>-1##.
For V=-0.5, the full sum ("correct value") is 2/3. The partial sums go: 1, 1/2, 3/4, 5/8, 11/16, 23/32, ... . In each case the next partial sum ends up beyond the correct value.

Ahhh. See mfb's post below for the rest of the story.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Leo Authersh
You need some additional condition for that. ##|a_{n+1}|<|a_n|## is not necessary but sufficient to make that statement true.

Let's assume we have this additional condition, and let's say ##a_n>0## (the proof works exactly the same with flipped signs). Then ##a_{n+1} + a_{n+2}<0## and ##a_{n+3} + a_{n+4}<0## and so on. The sum of all these pairs is negative as well, so the sum of the first n terms overestimates the limit.
At the same time, we know that ##a_{n+2} + a_{n+3}>0## and ##a_{n+4} + a_{n+5}>0## and so on. The sum of the first n+1 terms underestimates the limit. It is ##|a_{n+1}|## smaller than the sum of the first n terms, therefore the error after the nth term is at most the size of the next term.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Leo Authersh and .Scott
Thank you for the excellent intuitive answers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K