I Error of the WKB approximation

phyQu
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
How to calculate the error made using the WKB approximation?
hello everyone

I tell you a little about my situation.
I already found the approximate wavefunctions for the schrodinger equation with the potential ##V(x) = x^2##, likewise, energy, etc.
I have the approximate WKB solution and also the exact numeric solution.

What I need to do is to calculate the error of the approximate solution with respect to the exact solution,
but I need help to start, because I am lost with this topic.

Will it be possible to make an error analysis?
Will it be possible apply that is defined as ##e = |y_{exact} - y_{approx}|##?

Do you know if someone has already worked out the error for the WKB approximation?
Do you know of any recent article dealing with this?
I've searched the internet and I can't find anything that tells me specifically about the error of this method, please, can someone help me.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not aware of any previous results concerning the error of the WKB approximation. Since the quality of the approximation depends on the variation of the potential with respect to the oscillation (wave number) of the wave function, I would be surprised if there was a general answer to this.

I would calculate the relative error on the eigenenergy as well as the L2 norm of the difference in wave functions,
$$
\int_{-\infty}^\infty \left| \psi_\textrm{exact}(x) - \psi_\textrm{approx}(x) \right|^2 \, dx
$$
However, this might be too much influenced by the complex phase, which is not physically relevant, so I would also calculate the difference in probability
$$
\int_{-\infty}^\infty \left| \psi_\textrm{exact}(x)\right|^2 - \left|\psi_\textrm{approx}(x) \right|^2 \, dx
$$
 
Thank you very much, by the way, do you know a book that has this topic you are talking about? I would help me to reference my work.
 
The latter integral is not a good measure for the "distance of states", because the overall factor is just determined by the normalization condition, i.e., that integral should be 0 when normalizing both wave functions properly.
 
  • Like
Likes phyQu and DrClaude
DrClaude said:
However, this might be too much influenced by the complex phase, which is not physically relevant, so I would also calculate the difference in probability
$$
\int_{-\infty}^\infty \left| \psi_\textrm{exact}(x)\right|^2 - \left|\psi_\textrm{approx}(x) \right|^2 \, dx
$$
vanhees71 said:
The latter integral is not a good measure for the "distance of states", because the overall factor is just determined by the normalization condition, i.e., that integral should be 0 when normalizing both wave functions properly.
Well, you could integrate over the absolute value of the differences:
$$
\int_{-\infty}^\infty \left|\left| \psi_\textrm{exact}(x)\right|^2 - \left|\psi_\textrm{approx}(x) \right|^2\right| \, dx
$$
 
  • Like
Likes phyQu, DrClaude and vanhees71
vanhees71 said:
The latter integral is not a good measure for the "distance of states", because the overall factor is just determined by the normalization condition, i.e., that integral should be 0 when normalizing both wave functions properly.
Obviously :confused:. I should've thought a bit more about it. I was after a measure of the difference in local probability distribution. Maybe something like
$$
\max_x \left( \left| \psi_\textrm{exact}(x)\right|^2 - \left|\psi_\textrm{approx}(x) \right|^2 \right)
$$
 
  • Like
Likes phyQu and vanhees71
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top