I Error of the WKB approximation

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the error of the WKB approximation for the Schrödinger equation with a quadratic potential. Participants suggest methods for error analysis, including calculating the relative error in eigenenergy and using integrals to compare wave functions. They highlight the importance of considering the normalization of wave functions and the influence of complex phases on error measurements. A measure of the difference in local probability distribution is proposed as a potentially useful approach. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for careful consideration of how to quantify the error in the WKB approximation.
phyQu
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
How to calculate the error made using the WKB approximation?
hello everyone

I tell you a little about my situation.
I already found the approximate wavefunctions for the schrodinger equation with the potential ##V(x) = x^2##, likewise, energy, etc.
I have the approximate WKB solution and also the exact numeric solution.

What I need to do is to calculate the error of the approximate solution with respect to the exact solution,
but I need help to start, because I am lost with this topic.

Will it be possible to make an error analysis?
Will it be possible apply that is defined as ##e = |y_{exact} - y_{approx}|##?

Do you know if someone has already worked out the error for the WKB approximation?
Do you know of any recent article dealing with this?
I've searched the internet and I can't find anything that tells me specifically about the error of this method, please, can someone help me.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not aware of any previous results concerning the error of the WKB approximation. Since the quality of the approximation depends on the variation of the potential with respect to the oscillation (wave number) of the wave function, I would be surprised if there was a general answer to this.

I would calculate the relative error on the eigenenergy as well as the L2 norm of the difference in wave functions,
$$
\int_{-\infty}^\infty \left| \psi_\textrm{exact}(x) - \psi_\textrm{approx}(x) \right|^2 \, dx
$$
However, this might be too much influenced by the complex phase, which is not physically relevant, so I would also calculate the difference in probability
$$
\int_{-\infty}^\infty \left| \psi_\textrm{exact}(x)\right|^2 - \left|\psi_\textrm{approx}(x) \right|^2 \, dx
$$
 
Thank you very much, by the way, do you know a book that has this topic you are talking about? I would help me to reference my work.
 
The latter integral is not a good measure for the "distance of states", because the overall factor is just determined by the normalization condition, i.e., that integral should be 0 when normalizing both wave functions properly.
 
  • Like
Likes phyQu and DrClaude
DrClaude said:
However, this might be too much influenced by the complex phase, which is not physically relevant, so I would also calculate the difference in probability
$$
\int_{-\infty}^\infty \left| \psi_\textrm{exact}(x)\right|^2 - \left|\psi_\textrm{approx}(x) \right|^2 \, dx
$$
vanhees71 said:
The latter integral is not a good measure for the "distance of states", because the overall factor is just determined by the normalization condition, i.e., that integral should be 0 when normalizing both wave functions properly.
Well, you could integrate over the absolute value of the differences:
$$
\int_{-\infty}^\infty \left|\left| \psi_\textrm{exact}(x)\right|^2 - \left|\psi_\textrm{approx}(x) \right|^2\right| \, dx
$$
 
  • Like
Likes phyQu, DrClaude and vanhees71
vanhees71 said:
The latter integral is not a good measure for the "distance of states", because the overall factor is just determined by the normalization condition, i.e., that integral should be 0 when normalizing both wave functions properly.
Obviously :confused:. I should've thought a bit more about it. I was after a measure of the difference in local probability distribution. Maybe something like
$$
\max_x \left( \left| \psi_\textrm{exact}(x)\right|^2 - \left|\psi_\textrm{approx}(x) \right|^2 \right)
$$
 
  • Like
Likes phyQu and vanhees71
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...