I Error on a weighing scale due to wrong size

AI Thread Summary
When weighing a rigid object that overhangs a scale's tray, the measurement error is generally minimal, often estimated at zero unless the object is unevenly distributed or tilting the pan. The shape of the object can affect the measurement; for example, rod-shaped items can be positioned to minimize overhang. Conducting tests by weighing items with and without overhang can help assess precision and identify any variations. It's recommended to repeat measurements multiple times for accuracy. Overall, experimenting with different placements and shapes can provide insights into potential errors in weighing.
cloa513
Messages
36
Reaction score
4
If you have say a 15 centimetre long piece of rigid plastic and the weighing scale's tray is only 10 centimetres, what is an estimate of the error that introduces in the measurement assuming the weight is still within normal parameters for the weighing scale. I was wondering what the approximate error in general for moderately rigid materials? It happens now and again at work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would expect zero, unless the overhanging part is resting on something or the weight distribution is so uneven it's tilting the pan.

What shape are the things you weigh? Can you hold them vertical somehow so they are fully within the pan? For example, if they are rod-shaped they could be placed horizontally across the top of a cup and then nearly-vertically in it. Then you could compare the measured weights with and without an overhang as a test. Remember to repeat each measurement a few times (take everything off the scale and put it back on) to check your precision.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost
Shape of things- plates.
 
Hard for you to test, then. The answer is still zero.
 
cloa513 said:
I was wondering what the approximate error in general for moderately rigid materials?
Experiment with a test item, offset and hanging over the pan in different directions. Then break it up and weigh it in the pan. How much variation do you see?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Off resonance driving of a MW/RF cavity'

Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Child's experiment to weigh air
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
I Bicycle front tire wobble due to weight on the back of the bike
Replies
21
Views
5K
I Size Effect on Structural Strength
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Uncertainty in Scale Measurement
Replies
1
Views
2K
Interesting bouyancy theoretical question
Replies
1
Views
2K
Error analysis: propagation of error
Replies
15
Views
4K
I Error on a transition frequency
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Desirable estimator properties...
Replies
7
Views
2K
Force Field Experiments: Realistic Physics Questions
Replies
8
Views
3K
What Happens if a Scale Model of the Sun Weighs as Much as the Real Sun?
Replies
3
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top