Escape velocity for object on Earth

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the escape velocity for an object under a modified gravitational force described by F = KMm/r³. The correct escape velocity formula derived is v_e = √(KM/R²), contrasting with the initial misunderstanding involving Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation. The participants clarify that the problem requires using an inverse-cube law rather than the standard inverse-square law, leading to the correct integration of the force to find potential energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational force equations, specifically F = KMm/r³.
  • Familiarity with escape velocity calculations using v_e = √(2GM/R).
  • Knowledge of potential energy concepts and their relationship to kinetic energy.
  • Basic calculus skills for integrating force functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of inverse-cube gravitational laws on celestial mechanics.
  • Learn about conservative forces and their potential energy equations.
  • Explore advanced integration techniques in physics for force and energy calculations.
  • Investigate the differences between Newton's gravitational law and alternative gravitational models.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching gravitational concepts, and anyone interested in advanced mechanics and theoretical physics.

thyrgle
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose the gravitational force of the Earth on a body was F = \frac{KMm}{r^3}. What escape velocity would a body need to escape the gravitational field of the Earth?


Homework Equations



v_e = \sqrt{\frac{2GM}{R}}
F_g = G*\frac{m_1*m_2}{r^2}

The Attempt at a Solution



G*\frac{m_1*m_2}{r^2}=\frac{KM_em}{r^3}
m_1 and m_2 cross out with M and m. r^3 and r^2 can be reduced to give:
G=K/R

Re-plug back into v_e equation:

\sqrt{\frac{2KM}{R^2}}

But the given solution says:

\sqrt{\frac{KM}{R^2}}

Where did I go wrong? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you're misunderstanding the problem. You shouldn't use Newton's Universal Law of Graviation, because the whole point of the problem is to ask, "what if we lived in a universe where Newton's universal law of gravitation was different and was an inverse-cube law instead of an inverse-square law?"

Hint: for a conservative force, we have:F = -\frac{dU}{dr}which means thatU = -\int F(r)\,drwhere this integral will give you an arbitrary constant, but we have the freedom to set this arbitrary constant to whatever we want, and we typically set it to 0 so that the potential energy goes to 0 at infinity.
 
Ok thank you!

I can take the integral of (KMm/r^3) and get:

\frac{KMm}{2r^2}

then:

\frac{1}{2}mv^2 - \frac{KMm}{2r^2} = \frac{-KMm}{r_{max}}
v^2 = 2KMm\times (\frac{1}{2Rr^2})
v = \sqrt{\frac{KM}{R^2}}

Thanks again!
 
thyrgle said:
Ok thank you!

I can take the integral of (KMm/r^3) and get:

\frac{KMm}{2r^2}

then:

\frac{1}{2}mv^2 - \frac{KMm}{2r^2} = \frac{-KMm}{r_{max}}
v^2 = 2KMm\times (\frac{1}{2Rr^2})
v = \sqrt{\frac{KM}{R^2}}

Thanks again!

I don't understand your second equation, particularly the KmM/r_max term. All you have to do is equate the potential energy to the kinetic energy. (1/2)mv^2 = KMm/(2r^2). This gives you the right answer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K