Estimate Instantaneous Velocity

You have the equation: y(t)=48t−16t2When I plug 48(t)-16(t)^2 into \dfrac{y(2+h)-y(2)}{(2+h)-2}, I don't understand how to do it. Am I actually plugging in 48(t)-16(t)^2 into the y values of the other equation? Something like...y(t)=48t−16t2...or is there a different way to do it?
  • #1
133
23

Homework Statement


If a ball is thrown into the air with a velocity of 48 ft/s, its height in feet t seconds later is given by y = 48t − 16t2.
(a) Find the average velocity for the time period beginning when t = 2 and lasting for each of the following.

(i) 0.5 seconds

(ii) 0.1 seconds

(iii) 0.05 seconds

(iv) 0.01 seconds

(b) Estimate the instantaneous velocity when t = 2.

Homework Equations



[itex]Average Velocity =\dfrac{\triangle y}{\triangle t}[/itex] (Change in position over change in time)

[itex]m=\dfrac{y_{2}-y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Set: [itex]t = 2[/itex] and [itex]t = 2 + h[/itex] (let h be the time difference) [itex]\ne 0[/itex]

[itex]t = 2[/itex] is [itex]y_{1},x_{1}[/itex] and [itex]t = 2 + h[/itex] is [itex]y_{2},x_{2}[/itex]

Average Velocity = [itex]\dfrac{y(2+h)-y(2)}{(2+h)-2}[/itex]

Now with [itex]y=48t-16t^2[/itex], we will replace [itex]t[/itex] with [itex]2[/itex] and [itex]2 + h[/itex].

[itex]\dfrac{48(2+h)-16(2+h)^2-[48(2)-16(2)^2)]}{h}[/itex]

[itex]\dfrac{96+48h-16(4+4h+h^2)-96+64}{h}[/itex]

[itex]\dfrac{48h-64-64h-16h^2+64}{h}[/itex]

[itex]\dfrac{-16h^2-16h}{h}[/itex]

[itex]\dfrac{h(-16h-16)}{h}[/itex]

Average Velocity =[itex]-16h-16[/itex]

Then I plug in (i) 0.5 into the equation like this: [itex]-16(0.5)-16=24[/itex]
I do this for the rest of them and get correct answers according to the online "WebAssign" website. Now I'm stuck on (b) "Estimate the instantaneous velocity when t = 2." You can look at my picture, I tried plugging in values near 2 like 2.1 and 2.01, etc, into [itex]y=48t-16t^2[/itex] What am I doing wrong? So as I get closer to 2 I get closer to the slope of 31.999 which then you make an educated guess (by rounding) and get 32. But this is wrong. I don't know why? Also, I heard there is another method for finding average velocity, my book doesn't have it--anyone know it? Much appreciation.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0123.JPG
    IMG_0123.JPG
    22.4 KB · Views: 1,353
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
FritoTaco said:

Homework Statement


If a ball is thrown into the air with a velocity of 48 ft/s, its height in feet t seconds later is given by y = 48t − 16t2.
(a) Find the average velocity for the time period beginning when t = 2 and lasting for each of the following.

(i) 0.5 seconds

(ii) 0.1 seconds

(iii) 0.05 seconds

(iv) 0.01 seconds

(b) Estimate the instantaneous velocity when t = 2.

Homework Equations



[itex]Average Velocity =\dfrac{\triangle y}{\triangle t}[/itex] (Change in position over change in time)

[itex]m=\dfrac{y_{2}-y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Set: [itex]t = 2[/itex] and [itex]t = 2 + h[/itex] (let h be the time difference) [itex]\ne 0[/itex]

[itex]t = 2[/itex] is [itex]y_{1},x_{1}[/itex] and [itex]t = 2 + h[/itex] is [itex]y_{2},x_{2}[/itex]

Average Velocity = [itex]\dfrac{y(2+h)-y(2)}{(2+h)-2}[/itex]

Now with [itex]y=48t-16t^2[/itex], we will replace [itex]t[/itex] with [itex]2[/itex] and [itex]2 + h[/itex].

[itex]\dfrac{48(2+h)-16(2+h)^2-[48(2)-16(2)^2)]}{h}[/itex]

[itex]\dfrac{96+48h-16(4+4h+h^2)-96+64}{h}[/itex]

[itex]\dfrac{48h-64-64h-16h^2+64}{h}[/itex]

[itex]\dfrac{-16h^2-16h}{h}[/itex]

[itex]\dfrac{h(-16h-16)}{h}[/itex]

Average Velocity =[itex]-16h-16[/itex]

Then I plug in (i) 0.5 into the equation like this: [itex]-16(0.5)-16=24[/itex]
I do this for the rest of them and get correct answers according to the online "WebAssign" website. Now I'm stuck on (b) "Estimate the instantaneous velocity when t = 2." You can look at my picture, I tried plugging in values near 2 like 2.1 and 2.01, etc, into [itex]y=48t-16t^2[/itex] What am I doing wrong? So as I get closer to 2 I get closer to the slope of 31.999 which then you make an educated guess (by rounding) and get 32. But this is wrong. I don't know why? Also, I heard there is another method for finding average velocity, my book doesn't have it--anyone know it? Much appreciation.
For the instantaneous velocity near t = 2, look at the change in position divided by the change in time.

Look at ##\frac{y(2 + h) - y(2)}{2 + h - 2}##, for some values of h that are close to 0, say h = .1, h = .01, h = .001.
You should get a value close to -16 ft/sec.
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
  • #3
My teacher also said use values like 0.1, 0.01, etc. Why? I don't get why we're using those values? Also, how do we make the equation where we can plug in those values? from using [itex]\dfrac{y(2+h)-y(2)}{(2+h)-(2)}[/itex]
 
Last edited:
  • #4
FritoTaco said:
My teacher also said use values like 0.1, 0.01, etc. Why? I don't get why we're using those values?
Because you want the time interval to be very short so as to get a closer estimate of the instantaneous velocity.
FritoTaco said:
Also, how do we make the equation where we can plug in those values? from using [itex]\dfrac{y(2+h)-y(2)}{(2+h)-(2)}[/itex]
You have the equation: ##y(t) = 48t - 16t^2##
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
  • #5
Mark44 said:
Because you want the time interval to be very short so as to get a closer estimate of the instantaneous velocity.

This is where I don't understand. It says find instantaneous velocity when t = 2. Okay, so don't we want to use values close to 2? Like 2.1, 2.01. So if it was like, "find instantaneous velocity closer to when t = 5", would I still use 0.1, 0.01, etc? Because that means we are 0.1 from 5 or 0.01 from 5?

Mark44 said:
You have the equation: y(t)=48t−16t2

When I plug [itex]48(t)-16(t)^2[/itex] into [itex]\dfrac{y(2+h)-y(2)}{(2+h)-2}[/itex], I don't understand how to do it. Am I actually plugging in [itex]48(t)-16(t)^2[/itex] into the y values of the other equation? Something like this:

[itex]\dfrac{48t-16t^2(2+h)-48t-16t^2(2)}{2+h-2}[/itex]? Then distribute and simplify it down more?
 
  • #6
FritoTaco said:
This is where I don't understand. It says find instantaneous velocity when t = 2. Okay, so don't we want to use values close to 2? Like 2.1, 2.01. So if it was like, "find instantaneous velocity closer to when t = 5", would I still use 0.1, 0.01, etc? Because that means we are 0.1 from 5 or 0.01 from 5?
Yes. If h = .01, then 2 + h = 2 + .01 = 2.01
FritoTaco said:
When I plug [itex]48(t)-16(t)^2[/itex] into [itex]\dfrac{y(2+h)-y(2)}{(2+h)-2}[/itex], I don't understand how to do it. Am I actually plugging in [itex]48(t)-16(t)^2[/itex] into the y values of the other equation? Something like this:
[itex]\dfrac{48t-16t^2(2+h)-48t-16t^2(2)}{2+h-2}[/itex]? Then distribute and simplify it down more?
No, you are "plugging in" 2 + h and 2, respectively, into your height function y(t) = 48t - 16t2
For y(2 + h), replace t in your formula with 2 + h.
For y(2), replace t with 2.
Then simplify the result.
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
  • #7
Mark44 said:
No, you are "plugging in" 2 + h and 2, respectively, into your height function y(t) = 48t - 16t2
For y(2 + h), replace t in your formula with 2 + h.
For y(2), replace t with 2.
Then simplify the result.

[itex]48(2+h)-16(2)^2[/itex]

[itex]96+48h-64[/itex]

[itex]48h-32[/itex]

Am I doing this right?
 
  • #8
FritoTaco said:
[itex]48(2+h)-16(2)^2[/itex]
I don't know what you're doing above.
FritoTaco said:
[itex]96+48h-64[/itex]

[itex]48h-32[/itex]

Am I doing this right?
No. This is what you should be evaluating: ##\frac{y(2+h)-y(2)}{(2+h)-2}##, using ##y(t) = 48t - 16t^2##. The quotient here gives you the average speed between time t = 2 + h and time t = 2.
Edit: Fixed a typo I had in the y(t) formula.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
  • #9
Mark44 said:
No. This is what you should be evaluating: y(2+h)−y(2)(2+h)−2y(2+h)−y(2)(2+h)−2\frac{y(2+h)-y(2)}{(2+h)-2}, using y(t)=48t−32t2y(t)=48t−32t2y(t) = 48t - 32t^2. The quotient here gives you the average speed between time t = 2 + h and time t = 2.

How did you get [itex]y(t)=48t-32t^2[/itex]?

Also, in above when you said "For y(2 + h), replace t in your formula with 2 + h. For y(2), replace t with 2." Isn't that what I did and got the [itex]48h - 32[/itex]?
 
  • #10
FritoTaco said:
How did you get [itex]y(t)=48t-32t^2[/itex]?
I miswrote 32t2 instead of 16t2. I have fixed my typo.

FritoTaco said:
Also, in above when you said "For y(2 + h), replace t in your formula with 2 + h. For y(2), replace t with 2." Isn't that what I did and got the [itex]48h - 32[/itex]?
Whatever you did isn't right. y(2 + h) gives you two terms, and y(2) also gives you two terms. Also, you have 2 + h - 2 in the denominator.
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
  • #11
FritoTaco said:
Also, in above when you said "For y(2 + h), replace t in your formula with 2 + h. For y(2), replace t with 2." Isn't that what I did and got the [itex]48h - 32[/itex]?
Let's back up a few steps. You need to evaluate ##\frac{y(2 + h) - y(2)}{2 + h - 2}##, using ##y(t) = 48t - 16t^2##.

What do you get for y(2 + h)?
What do you get for y(2)?
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
  • #12
Am I placing [itex]48t-16t^2[/itex] into the y part of both [itex]y(2+h)[/itex] and [itex]y(2)[/itex]?

Like this maybe:

[itex]\dfrac{48(2+h)-16(2+h)^2-[48(2)-16(2)^2]}{(2+h)-2}[/itex]

[itex]\dfrac{96+48h-16(h^2+4h+4)-96+64}{(2+h)-2}[/itex]

[itex]\dfrac{96+48h-16h^2-64h-64-96+64}{(2+h)-2}[/itex]

[itex]\dfrac{-16h^2-16h}{(2+h)-2}[/itex]

I'm pretty sure something isn't right but I gave it a go here.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
FritoTaco said:
Am I placing [itex]48t-16t^2[/itex] into the y part of both [itex]y(2+h)[/itex] and [itex]y(2)[/itex]?

Like this maybe:

[itex]\dfrac{48(2+h)-16(2+h)^2-[48(2)-16(2)^2]}{(2+h)-2}[/itex]

[itex]\dfrac{96+48h-16(h^2+4h+4)-96+64}{(2+h)-2}[/itex]

[itex]\dfrac{96+48h-16h^2-64h-64-96+64}{(2+h)-2}[/itex]

[itex]\dfrac{-16h^2-16h}{(2+h)-2}[/itex]

I'm pretty sure something isn't right but I gave it a go here.
This is correct, but you should simplify the denominator.

When you've done that, estimate the velocity at a few times close to 2 sec., such as 2.1 (h = .1), 2.01 (h = .01), and however more you need to do.
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
  • #14
Mark44 said:
This is correct, but you should simplify the denominator.

When you've done that, estimate the velocity at a few times close to 2 sec., such as 2.1 (h = .1), 2.01 (h = .01), and however more you need to do.

Will it just be [itex]\dfrac{-16h^2-16h}{h}[/itex]?
 
  • #15
FritoTaco said:
Will it just be [itex]\dfrac{-16h^2-16h}{h}[/itex]?
And simplfy that...
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
  • #16
Like this:

[itex]\dfrac{-16h(h+1)}{h}[/itex] Factor

[itex]16(h+1)[/itex] Cancel out the h
 
  • #17
FritoTaco said:
Like this:

[itex]\dfrac{-16h(h+1)}{h}[/itex] Factor

[itex]16(h+1)[/itex] Cancel out the h
Where did the minus sign go?

When you get that straigtened out, pick a few (small) values of h, as described in parts i) through iv) of the first post, and then estimate the velocity at t = 2 seconds.
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
  • #18
Oh, I forgot about that. It should've been there as [itex]-16(h+1)[/itex]

i.)0.5

[itex]-16(0.5+1) = -24 ft/s[/itex]​

ii.)0.1

[itex]-16(0.1+1) = -17.6 ft/s[/itex]​

iii.)0.05

[itex]-16(0.05+1) = -16.8 ft/s[/itex]​

iv.)0.01

[itex]-16(0.01+1) = 1-6.16 ft/s[/itex]​

b.) Estimate the instantaneous velocity when t = 2.

[itex]-16(0.1+1) = -17.6 ft/s[/itex]

[itex]-16(0.01+1) = -16.16 ft/s[/itex]

[itex]-16(0.001+1) = -16.08 ft/s[/itex]

Estimate: [itex]-16 ft/s[/itex].

I entered that in and got it right! Thank you very much for your help!
 
  • #19
FritoTaco said:
iv.)0.01

[itex]-16(0.01+1) = 1-6.16 ft/s[/itex]
Surely, you mean -16.16 ft/sec
FritoTaco said:
b.) Estimate the instantaneous velocity when t = 2.

[itex]-16(0.1+1) = -17.6 ft/s[/itex]

[itex]-16(0.01+1) = -16.16 ft/s[/itex]

[itex]-16(0.001+1) = -16.08 ft/s[/itex]

Estimate: [itex]-16 ft/s[/itex].

I entered that in and got it right! Thank you very much for your help!
 
  • Like
Likes FritoTaco
  • #20
Oh, oops. Yeah, -16.16ft/s.
 

Suggested for: Estimate Instantaneous Velocity

Back
Top