Estimate top quark branching ratios without calculating

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the branching ratios of top quark decay processes, specifically focusing on the decays involving W bosons and their subsequent decay products. The original poster seeks qualitative insights rather than quantitative calculations, emphasizing the need to consider the decay modes of the W boson.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of W boson decay modes, questioning the completeness of descriptions such as "c quark" in the context of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and the CKM matrix. There is discussion about the relative probabilities of different decay channels and the effects of color charge on decay processes.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants examining various aspects of the decay processes and the factors influencing branching ratios. Some guidance has been offered regarding the CKM matrix and its implications for decay probabilities, but there is no explicit consensus on the estimates being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of quark flavors, decay probabilities, and the role of the CKM matrix, while also considering the implications of color charge in quark decays. The original poster's request for qualitative estimations suggests constraints on the level of detail and calculation expected in the responses.

ClaraBS
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi, I need to get an estimate of the branching ratios of the processes [/B]

t ---> b + W ---> b + c anti-s

t ---> b + W ---> b + anti-tau nu(tau)


without doing the calculations, just a qualitative estimation.
I know I have to take into account the way W decays leptonically or hadronically, but I cannot arrive to an answer.
Thanks a lot for any help.


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ClaraBS said:
I know I have to take into account the way W decays leptonically or hadronically
Well that is obvious from the problem statement.
What could lead to a deviation from a ratio of 1?
Is "c quark" a full and precise description of a quark, especially in QCD?
 
mfb said:
Is "c quark" a full and precise description of a quark, especially in QCD?

No, it is just a flavour eigenstate. I have to consider the CKM matrix relating flavour to mass eigenstates... So, given the CKM element ## V_{cs} = 0.974 ##, the probability for W to decay into c anti-s should be its square, ## 0.974^2 \approx 0.95 ## ?
But what about the leptonic channel?
 
Well, that is a contribution, but that effect is small.
What about colors?

The decay probability W->c ##\bar s## is certainly not 95%. That is just a relative value (relative to a diagonal CKM matrix).
 
It seemed to me really strange to get 95%, in fact, but I am definitely not getting the point :frown:
 
Concerning the CKM matrix: if the matrix would be diagonal (no transitions between generations), then the matrix element would be 1 for ##u \bar d##, ##c \bar s## and even for ##t \bar b##. The last one is impossible due to energy/momentum conservation of course. The "1" would just tell you that the two former decays have approximately the same probability. It does not tell you the absolute probability of any decay.
Now the matrix element does not give exactly 1. So ##c \bar s## is a bit less likely, because ##c \bar d## and ##u \bar s## can also happen.
This is a tiny effect, however - 5% difference.

What about colors? Quarks can have three different colors. For ##W \to c \bar s##, do you know which color the c quark gets? If not, do you care about it? If not, you should consider all possible cases as decay modes, and add their individual probabilities.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K