Estimating (0.97)^3(2.02) using a linear approximation

  • Thread starter Thread starter _N3WTON_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the value of (0.97)^{3}(2.02) using linear approximation techniques. The subject area is calculus, specifically focusing on linearization and partial derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss defining a function z = x^{3}y and selecting points a = 1 and b = 2 for linearization. There is some confusion regarding the correct formulation of partial derivatives.

Discussion Status

Some participants are confirming their approach and seeking validation on their method. Guidance has been offered regarding the correct identification of partial derivatives, indicating a productive direction in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on ensuring the correct application of linearization techniques and the proper setup of the problem, with some participants acknowledging errors in their initial formulations.

_N3WTON_
Messages
350
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Use an appropriate linear approximation to estimate the value [itex](0.97)^{3}(2.02)[/itex]. Write your answer as a simplified decimal.

Homework Equations


Linearization:
[itex]L(x,y) = f(a,b) + \frac{\partial z}{\partial x}(a,b)(x-a) + \frac{\partial z}{\partial y}(a,b)(y-b)[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I am a little confused on this one about how to get going, but once I get started this shouldn't pose to much of a problem. I was thinking (I came here to confirm this thought) that I could define a function:
[itex]z = x^{3}y[/itex]
Then I would take:
[itex]a = 1 \hspace{2 mm} b = 2[/itex]
Then I would go from there and formulate the linearization. I just wanted to see if this was the right way to proceed or not..
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
_N3WTON_ said:

Homework Statement


Use an appropriate linear approximation to estimate the value [itex](0.97)^{3}(2.02)[/itex]. Write your answer as a simplified decimal.

Homework Equations


Linearization:
[itex]L(x,y) = f(a,b) + \frac{\partial x}{\partial z}(a,b)(x-a) + \frac{\partial y}{\partial z}(a,b)(y-b)[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I am a little confused on this one about how to get going, but once I get started this shouldn't pose to much of a problem. I was thinking (I came here to confirm this thought) that I could define a function:
[itex]z = x^{3}y[/itex]
Then I would take:
[itex]a = 1 \hspace{2 mm} b = 2[/itex]
Then I would go from there and formulate the linearization. I just wanted to see if this was the right way to proceed or not..
Looks like you're mostly on the right track, but your partials aren't right.

Since z = f(x, y), the partials you want are ##\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}## and ##\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}##. It might be that you wrote them upside down inadvertently.
 
_N3WTON_ said:

Homework Statement


Use an appropriate linear approximation to estimate the value [itex](0.97)^{3}(2.02)[/itex]. Write your answer as a simplified decimal.

Homework Equations


Linearization:
[itex]L(x,y) = f(a,b) + \frac{\partial x}{\partial z}(a,b)(x-a) + \frac{\partial y}{\partial z}(a,b)(y-b)[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I am a little confused on this one about how to get going, but once I get started this shouldn't pose to much of a problem. I was thinking (I came here to confirm this thought) that I could define a function:
[itex]z = x^{3}y[/itex]
Then I would take:
[itex]a = 1 \hspace{2 mm} b = 2[/itex]
Then I would go from there and formulate the linearization. I just wanted to see if this was the right way to proceed or not..

Best policy: just go ahead and do it.
 
Mark44 said:
Looks like you're mostly on the right track, but your partials aren't right.

Since z = f(x, y), the partials you want are ##\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}## and ##\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}##. It might be that you wrote them upside down inadvertently.
Ah, thank you...I just wrote it down wrong by accident :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K