Estimating Flame Temperature: A Basic Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter samblohm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Temperature
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on estimating flame temperature using a heat balance approach, particularly the adiabatic flame temperature, which is calculated without heat transfer. Key parameters include the specific heat capacities of reactants and products, with values of 8 J/(mol x K) and 3 J/(mol x K) respectively, and an energy release of 1000 KJ from the reaction. For rough estimates, a first law analysis can achieve approximately 30% accuracy, while precise calculations require complex programming and consideration of factors like heat capacity variations and radiative heat transfer. Experimental methods yield the most accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of specific heat capacity and its units (J/(mol x K))
  • Familiarity with the first law of thermodynamics
  • Knowledge of adiabatic processes in thermodynamics
  • Basic principles of chemical reactions and energy release
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the calculation of adiabatic flame temperature using the first law of thermodynamics
  • Explore software tools for simulating flame temperature calculations
  • Study the effects of heat capacity variations on flame temperature
  • Investigate experimental methods for measuring flame temperature accurately
USEFUL FOR

Chemical engineers, thermodynamics students, researchers in combustion science, and anyone involved in estimating or measuring flame temperatures.

samblohm
Messages
60
Reaction score
1
How could someone roughly calculate flame temperature? Let's say that a chemical reaction occurs at 1000F and the specific heat capacity of the reactants averages to 8 J/(mol x K). And the energy released in the reaction was 1000 KJ and the specific heat capacity of the products in 3 J/(mol x K). I really don't see anything else necessary to calculate flame temperature, but I could definitely be wrong. Is is a simple equation or does it require some hardcore computer program?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
For a rough estimate heat balance should be sufficient. For a precise result there is nothing like an experiment. I guess engineers do have specialized formulas for such calculations.
 
I only looking for a rough estimate. What do you mean by heat balance? How could it be used for a rough calculation?
 
samblohm said:
What do you mean by heat balance?

This is a very basic concept, see for example

http://www.chem.latech.edu/~deddy/chem104/L5Calorie.htm

There are plenty of materials explaining these things on the web.

Same approach used to calculation of the flame temperature:

http://www.et.byu.edu/~rowley/ChEn273/Topics/Energy_Balances/Reacting_Systems/Adiabatic_Flame_Temp.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It looks like you're after the adiabatic flame temperature, i.e. temperature with no heat transfer. As Borek stated you can determine the adiabatic flame temperature with a simple first law analysis within an accuracy of maybe 30%ish. To calculate a more realistic flame temperature you need to take into account variations in heat capacity, dissociation, radiative heat transfer, etc. This requires some complex code and I think some I think you can download for free. Of course the most accurate method is just to perform an experiment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K