Estimating Remainders for Taylor Series of Sin(x)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the estimation of remainders for the Taylor series of the sine function, specifically focusing on the third-order Taylor polynomial for sin(x). Participants explore the implications of the remainder theorem and how it applies to the Taylor series expansion, including the treatment of terms that vanish in the series.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that a third-order Taylor polynomial for sin(x) includes terms up to the x^3 term, while others clarify that it refers to the polynomial including the x^3 term itself.
  • There is a discussion about the remainder formula, where some participants state that n refers to the number of terms rather than the powers of x, suggesting that the x^5 term is the next relevant term for the remainder calculation.
  • One participant mentions that the x^4 term vanishes in the Taylor series for sin(x), which leads to the conclusion that the remainders R_3(x) and R_4(x) are equal.
  • Another participant emphasizes that finding an upper bound for R_4(x) is generally preferred for estimating the approximation quality of T_4(x) and T_3(x).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the third-order Taylor polynomial includes terms up to x^3, but there is some contention regarding the interpretation of the remainder theorem and the treatment of the vanishing x^4 term. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to calculating the remainder.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the application of the remainder theorem, particularly in relation to the vanishing x^4 term and how it affects the calculation of remainders. There is also a lack of consensus on the implications of using different n values in the remainder formula.

member 508213
I am just trying to clarify this point which I am unsure about:

If I am asked to write out (for example) a third order taylor polynomial for sin(x), does that mean I would write out 3 terms of the series OR to the x^3 term.

x-x^3/3!+x^5/5!

or just

x-x^3/3!Also, I have a question for the remainder theorem for taylor series (or Lagrange). If I am doing the remainder for a a polynomial for sinx written out as x-x^3/3!, the remainder theorem says use f^n+1(c)(x-a)^n+1/(n+1)!...but for sinx it skips the x^4 term so how would this work? I would assume you would just use the next term: (x^5/5!) but it does not say this anywhere I can find so I am unsure.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The 3rd order taylor series for sin(x) would only be up to the x^3 term.

In the remainder formula, n refers to the number of terms, not necessarily the powers. In this case x is the first term, -x^3/3! is the 2nd term, and x^5/5! is the 3rd term.
 
Third order in the general case means up to the ##x^3## term. When you remember that a lot of terms are zero in your expression because they involve the sine of zero, maybe it becomes more clear.
 
DarthMatter said:
Third order in the general case means up to the ##x^3## term.
A tiny bit of "wordsmithing" to be clear: "up to and including"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DarthMatter
jbstemp said:
In the remainder formula, n refers to the number of terms, not necessarily the powers. In this case x is the first term, -x^3/3! is the 2nd term, and x^5/5! is the 3rd term.
The n has the same meaning as in "expansion to order n", but the formula is true for every n so it does not really matter as long as you use the same n for both expansion and error.
Austin said:
but for sinx it skips the x^4 term so how would this work?
It is 0*x4. There is nothing special about the zero.
 
Austin said:
Also, I have a question for the remainder theorem for taylor series (or Lagrange). If I am doing the remainder for a a polynomial for sinx written out as x-x^3/3!, the remainder theorem says use f^n+1(c)(x-a)^n+1/(n+1)!...but for sinx it skips the x^4 term so how would this work? I would assume you would just use the next term: (x^5/5!) but it does not say this anywhere I can find so I am unsure.
By definition, the remainders are given by
\begin{align*}
R_3(x) &= \sin x - T_3(x) \\
R_4(x) &= \sin x - T_4(x)
\end{align*} where ##T_n(x)## is the n-th order Taylor polynomial. For ##\sin x## about x=0, you have ##T_3(x)=T_4(x)## because the ##x^4## term vanishes; therefore, the remainders ##R_3(x)## and ##R_4(x)## have to be equal. Typically, however, you don't calculate the actual remainder. Instead, you find an upper bound. If you find an upper bound for ##R_4(x)##, it would give you an idea for how well ##T_4(x)## approximates ##\sin x##, and since ##T_3(x)=T_4(x)##, it also tells you how well ##T_3(x)## approximates ##\sin x##. So why find an upper bound for ##R_4(x)## instead of ##R_3(x)##? It's because you generally get a better, more stringent estimate for the upper bound by using the formula for higher-order remainder.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K