Euler characteristic of complex projective plane

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the computation of the Euler characteristic of the complex projective plane, \(\mathbb{C}\mathrm{P}^2\). Participants explore various methods and theories from differential topology, including vector fields, triangulations, and the Riemann-Roch theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests computing the Euler characteristic by finding a non-vanishing vector field on \(\mathbb{C}\mathrm{P}^2\) and calculating the indices of isolated zeros.
  • Another participant points out that \(\mathbb{C}\mathrm{P}^2\) is the quotient of \(S^3\) by \(S^1\) and asks if any known non-vanishing vector fields on \(S^3\) can descend to \(\mathbb{C}\mathrm{P}^2\).
  • A participant recalls the identification of \(\mathbb{C}\mathrm{P}^2\) with \(S^5/S^1\) and considers how this might help in finding a vector field with isolated zeros.
  • Another participant mentions that there are natural non-vanishing vector fields on \(S^n\) for odd \(n\) and suggests checking if any of these can be used for computing the Euler characteristic.
  • One participant describes a method involving attaching a single 4-cell to \(\mathbb{C}\mathrm{P}^1\) and proposes that this construction could aid in determining the Euler characteristic.
  • A different approach is presented using a triangulation of a spherical shape, relating the Euler characteristic to the number of vertices, edges, and faces.
  • Another participant introduces the Riemann-Roch theorem and provides a detailed calculation involving divisors and intersection numbers to arrive at an Euler characteristic of 3.
  • Lastly, a participant discusses projecting the complex plane from a point to a line, applying the product formula for Euler characteristics, and concludes that the Euler characteristic of \(\mathbb{C}\mathrm{P}^2\) is 3.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views and methods for computing the Euler characteristic of \(\mathbb{C}\mathrm{P}^2\). There is no consensus on a single approach or final answer, as various calculations and theories are discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some methods rely on specific assumptions about vector fields and the topology of the spaces involved. The calculations presented involve different mathematical frameworks, which may lead to varying interpretations of the Euler characteristic.

jgens
Gold Member
Messages
1,575
Reaction score
50
How to compute \chi(\mathbb{C}\mathrm{P}^2)?

This problem is from a class on differential topology, so we have defined the Euler characteristic as the sum of the indices of isolated zeros on a non-vanishing vector field. Off the top of my head, I cannot think of any theorems which really help with this computation, so I am thinking I need to do this by finding a sufficiently nice vector field on \mathbb{C}\mathrm{P}^2 and the just calculating the indices of the isolated zeros by hand. Could someone help get me started with this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You know that CP^2 is the quotient of S^3 by S^1. Do you know of any nonvanishing vector field on S^3? It is easy to construct 3 of them. Check wheter any of them descends on CP^2 to a nonvanishing vector field.
 
quasar987 said:
You know that CP^2 is the quotient of S^3 by S^1. Do you know of any nonvanishing vector field on S^3? It is easy to construct 3 of them. Check wheter any of them descends on CP^2 to a nonvanishing vector field.

I thought the identification was \mathbb{C}\mathrm{P}^2 \cong S^5/S^1, but maybe I am remembering wrong. In any case, this does help me find a vector field on \mathbb{C}\mathrm{P}^2 with isolated zeros.
 
You're remembering right. But yeah, in any case, my idea was just this: there are "natural" nonvanishing vector field on S^n for n odd. Check whether by any chance any of them descends on CP² to one of the kind that helps you to compute the Euler caracteristic.
 
CP^2 is obtained by attaching a single 4-cell to CP^1. Does that help?
 
Oh you have a vector field definition of the euler characteristic. ok. think of a triangulation of the spherical Earth say as an icosahedron. then poke in the center of every face, so it becomes a valley, and raise up every vertex so it becomes a mountain peak. Then the edges sag in the middle as paths joining the mountain peaks.

now the gradient vector field for the height above sea level function has zeroes at each valley, each peak, and each mountain "pass" between two peaks. Moreover the valleys are local minima, the peaks are loical maxima, and the passes are saddle points. Thus the index of the vector field = V-E+F = #vertices - #edges + #faces. the usual euler characteristic.

eventually it can be deduced that also the euler characteristic equals the alternating sum of ( (-1)^k times) the number of k cells needed to construct the space as either a simplicial complex or a cell complex. Since the complex projective space is made by adding to real 4 space a complex projective line at infinity, it is constructed from adding a 4 cell to a 2-sphere.

I.e. it takes one 0-cell, one 2-cell, and one 4 cell. Since these are all even dimensional cells, so the answer is 3.
 
Last edited:
here's another computation via a useful theorem, the Riemann Roch theorem for surfaces. If D is any divisor, i.e. curve on the plane, then

chi(D) - chi(O) = (1/2)(D.[D-K]) where e is the euler characteristic of the surface,

chi is the alternating sum of the dimensions of the cohomology groups, K is the divisor of a differential form, and " . " means intersection number,.

In this case a differential form like dz has a pole only at infinity, and there of order three, so K = -3H where H is the class of a line. Moreover if we take D = H, then H is an ample divisor so chi(H) = # independent linear polynomials.

Moreover, chi(O) = (1/12)(K^2 + e), intersection number.

So we get 3 - (1/12)(9+e) = (1/2)(H.4H) = 2, or 3-2 = 1 = (1/12)(9 + e). So e = 3.

I hope I got this right.
 
Last edited:
heres another calculation. project the complex plane from a point to a line. after blowing up that point this gives a fiber bundle over P^1 with fibers P^1. By the product formula for euler characteristics, the euler characteristic of the blowup is the square of the euler characteristic of P^1, i.e. 4.

since the blowup added a 2 cycle, the euler characteristic of P^2 was 3.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
13K