A Euler Lagrange and the Calculus of Variations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding the independent variation of position and velocity when formulating the Lagrangian for a simple mechanical system in one dimension. The original poster initially struggled with the concept but received clarification that Lagrangian mechanics focuses on variations in position rather than velocity. It was noted that Hamiltonian mechanics operates in configuration space, which includes both position and velocity. Ultimately, the poster acknowledged the misunderstanding and expressed gratitude for the assistance received. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying variations in the context of Lagrangian mechanics.
Trying2Learn
Messages
375
Reaction score
57
TL;DR Summary
I cannot extract the Euler-Lagrange equation with different variation functions
Good Morning all

Yesterday, as I was trying to formulate my confusion properly, I had a series of posts as I circled around the issue.

I can now state it clearly: something is wrong :-) and I am so confused :-(

Here is the issue:

I formulate the Lagrangian for a simple mechanical system (let's go with 1D)

I formulate the variation of the position and the variation of the velocity, use the Gateaux derivative, work it though..

However, as I understand, I MUST vary the position and velocity INDEPENDENTLY!

And that is where the problem begins (for me)

Could someone read the attached, one page and tell me where I go wrong?

(And if someone can tell me how, I can post a Matlab code that actually tries DIFFERENT eta functions and shows that the correct solutoin produces a stationary Action -- and plots the area between KE and PE)
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is puzzling to me why you insist on an approach where position and velocity are varied independently

You appear to be referring to configuration space. For motion in the case of 1D spatial space: in terms of configuration space you have the position coordinate and the velocity coordinate.
Hamiltonian mechanics is formulated in terms of motion in configuration space.Lagrangian mechanics, the mechanics that uses the Euler-Lagrange equation, is formulated in terms of motion in spatial space.

To derive the Euler-Lagrange equation the applicable variation is variation of position.
 
Cleonis said:
It is puzzling to me why you insist on an approach where position and velocity are varied independently

You appear to be referring to configuration space. For motion in the case of 1D spatial space: in terms of configuration space you have the position coordinate and the velocity coordinate.
Hamiltonian mechanics is formulated in terms of motion in configuration space.Lagrangian mechanics, the mechanics that uses the Euler-Lagrange equation, is formulated in terms of motion in spatial space.

To derive the Euler-Lagrange equation the applicable variation is variation of position.
Ah ha! You are correct!

I also found this, just now

https://physics.stackexchange.com/q...it-make-sense-to-vary-the-position-and-the-ve

OK, so I am fine.

Sorry to have been a bother.

But thank you, everyone
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top