Euler-Lagrange Equations: EM Field Term

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
Gene Naden
Messages
320
Reaction score
64
This problem is about one small step in the derivation of Maxwell's equations in free space from the field Lagrangian. The Lagrangian contains a term proportional to

##\partial \mu A_\nu \partial^\mu A^\nu - \partial \nu A\mu \partial ^\mu A^\nu## where A is the four-vector potential.

The Euler-Lagrange equation requires a derivative ##\partial \mu ( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial ( \partial \mu A \nu )})##

The problem is to get a term ##\partial \mu ( \partial ^\mu A^\nu - \partial ^\nu A ^\mu)##

I want to apply the product rule of calculus to compute ##\frac {\partial ( \partial_\alpha A_\beta \partial ^\alpha A^\beta)}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu )}## and ##\frac {\partial ( \partial_\beta A_\alpha \partial ^\alpha A^\beta)}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu )}##

This should bring in a factor of two.

But I am having difficulty managing the indices. The stack exchange says I can use the identity for ##\frac{ \partial ( \partial_\alpha A _\beta )}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu)}## in terms of the Kronecker ##\delta## but I am unsure of the corresponding identity for ##\frac{ \partial ( \partial^\alpha A ^\beta )}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu)}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gene Naden said:
but I am unsure of the corresponding identity for ##\frac{ \partial ( \partial^\alpha A ^\beta )}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu)}##

Lower the indices in the numerator by extracting a metric from it, i.e., ##\partial^\alpha A^\beta = \eta^{\alpha\gamma}\eta^{\beta\delta} \partial_\gamma A_\delta##. The metric components are constant and can be taken out of the derivative. You can then apply your previous relation with deltas, essentially leaving you with the metric tensors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Gene Naden
Thanks, I get ##\frac{\partial \left( \partial ^\alpha A^\beta \right)}{\partial \left( \partial _\mu A_\nu \right)} = \eta ^{\alpha^\mu} \eta ^{\beta \nu}## and then it works out, just as you say.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71