A Euler-Lagrange Equations: EM Field Term

Gene Naden
Messages
320
Reaction score
64
This problem is about one small step in the derivation of Maxwell's equations in free space from the field Lagrangian. The Lagrangian contains a term proportional to

##\partial \mu A_\nu \partial^\mu A^\nu - \partial \nu A\mu \partial ^\mu A^\nu## where A is the four-vector potential.

The Euler-Lagrange equation requires a derivative ##\partial \mu ( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial ( \partial \mu A \nu )})##

The problem is to get a term ##\partial \mu ( \partial ^\mu A^\nu - \partial ^\nu A ^\mu)##

I want to apply the product rule of calculus to compute ##\frac {\partial ( \partial_\alpha A_\beta \partial ^\alpha A^\beta)}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu )}## and ##\frac {\partial ( \partial_\beta A_\alpha \partial ^\alpha A^\beta)}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu )}##

This should bring in a factor of two.

But I am having difficulty managing the indices. The stack exchange says I can use the identity for ##\frac{ \partial ( \partial_\alpha A _\beta )}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu)}## in terms of the Kronecker ##\delta## but I am unsure of the corresponding identity for ##\frac{ \partial ( \partial^\alpha A ^\beta )}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu)}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gene Naden said:
but I am unsure of the corresponding identity for ##\frac{ \partial ( \partial^\alpha A ^\beta )}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu)}##

Lower the indices in the numerator by extracting a metric from it, i.e., ##\partial^\alpha A^\beta = \eta^{\alpha\gamma}\eta^{\beta\delta} \partial_\gamma A_\delta##. The metric components are constant and can be taken out of the derivative. You can then apply your previous relation with deltas, essentially leaving you with the metric tensors.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Gene Naden
Thanks, I get ##\frac{\partial \left( \partial ^\alpha A^\beta \right)}{\partial \left( \partial _\mu A_\nu \right)} = \eta ^{\alpha^\mu} \eta ^{\beta \nu}## and then it works out, just as you say.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top