Euler-Lagrange Field Theory Question

jameson2
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the the Lagrangian density [tex]L= \frac{1}{2}\partial_\lambda\phi\partial^\lambda\phi + \frac{1}{3}\sigma\phi^3[/tex]
(a)Work out the equation of motion.

(b)Calculate from L the stress tensor: [tex]T^{\mu\nu}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi)}\partial^\nu\phi - g^{\mu\nu}L[/tex] where g is diagonal with matrix entries (1,-1,-1,-1).

(c)Find the 4-divergence of the stress tensor, [tex]\partial_\mu T^{\mu\nu}[/tex]

(d)Show that the stress tensor is conserved by demonstrating its 4-divergence is zero when the scalar field obeys its equation of motion i.e.[tex]\partial_\mu T^{\mu\nu} =0[/tex]

Homework Equations


Euler Lagrange Equation of Motion

The Attempt at a Solution


(a) I think that I have this right : [tex]\partial_\mu(\partial^\mu\phi)-\sigma \phi^2=0[/tex]

(b)I have that the first term in the stress tensor is [tex]\frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi)}\partial^\nu\phi=\partial^\mu\phi\partial^\nu\phi[/tex] but I don't know how to treat the second part, i.e. [tex]g^{\mu\nu}L=g^{\mu\nu}(\frac{1}{2}\partial_\lambda\phi\partial^\lambda\phi + \frac{1}{3}\sigma\phi^3)=?[/tex]
I just need to know how to treat the metric tensor g.

Obviously I haven't got to (c) or (d) yet, as I need the answer to (b).
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
Those two terms make up the stress tensor. There isn't anything in particular that you can do to simplify it.
 
So my stress tensor is:
[tex]T^{\mu\nu}=\partial^\mu\phi\partial^\nu\phi-g^{\nu\mu}L[/tex].

I think I'm close to getting the last parts:
[tex]\partial_\mu T^{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu(\partial^\mu\phi\partial^\nu\phi)-g^{\mu\nu}\partial_\mu(\frac{1}{2}\partial_\lambda\phi\partial^\lambda\phi+\frac{1}{3}\sigma\phi^3) = \partial^\mu\phi\partial_\mu(\partial^\nu\phi) + \partial^\nu\phi\partial_\mu(\partial^\mu\phi) - g^{\mu\nu}(\frac{1}{2}\partial^\lambda\phi\partial_\mu(\partial_\lambda\phi)+\frac{1}{2}\partial_\lambda\phi\partial_\mu(\partial^\lambda\phi) + 0)[/tex]

and then if it obeys the equation of motion;

[tex]\partial_\mu T^{\mu\nu} = 2\sigma \phi^2\partial^\nu\phi - g^{\mu\nu}[\frac{1}{2}\delta^\mu_\lambda\sigma\phi^2\partial_\lambda\phi + \frac{1}{2}\delta^\mu_\lambda\sigma\phi^2\partial_\lambda\phi][/tex]

but this doesn't seem to equal zero, as required in the last part...

[tex]\partial_\mu T^{\mu\nu} = 2\sigma \phi^2\partial^\nu\phi -\sigma \phi^2\partial^\nu\phi =\sigma \phi^2\partial^\nu\phi[/tex]

It seems as if I only have something slightly wrong, which is annoying.
 
Actually, it works out if I do is this way. When I'm applying the partial derivative to the second term of the stress tensor, is this how you do it? [tex]\partial_\mu (g^{\mu\nu}L) = \partial_\mu(g^{\mu\nu}) L + g^{\mu\nu} \partial_\mu L[/tex] I'm not sure if this is ok though. I use in the next line [tex]\partial_\mu(g^{\mu\nu})= \partial^\nu[/tex] which I'm not sure of.
 
The metric is constant. so

[tex] \partial_\mu (g^{\mu\nu}L) = \partial_\mu(g^{\mu\nu}) L + g^{\mu\nu} \partial_\mu L = \partial^\nu L[/tex]

I think you also left out a term in [tex]\partial_\mu T^{\mu\nu}[/tex] that is of the form [tex]\partial^\nu (\phi^3)[/tex] (it's what should be in place of +0 in the 2nd equation of post #3) that should cancel the term you had left over.
 
I was thinking that since [tex]\phi[/tex] is a scalar field, the derivative is just zero. I guess that's wrong then.
 
jameson2 said:
I was thinking that since [tex]\phi[/tex] is a scalar field, the derivative is just zero. I guess that's wrong then.

Being a scalar in this context means that the field [tex]\phi(x^\mu)[/tex] is invariant under Lorentz transformations. It doesn't mean that it is constant on spacetime.
 
Got it, thank you very much for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K