Eulers equation, i think? leonard suskin

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jerkazoid
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 3K views
jerkazoid
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
leonard susskind writes this on the chalk board a little after 1/2 way in this Nova episode on String theory

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/programs/ht/qt/3013_03.html
3536633512_73e6d9aedf_o.jpg

am i writing this correctly?

Γ [1-∝(s) Γ (1-∝(t)]
__________________
Γ [z-∝(s) -∝(t)]
edit spelld his name wrong
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Unless I am missing something it seems he missed a bracket. In the numerator there are 4 ( brackets and only 3 ) brackets.
 
Cyosis said:
Unless I am missing something it seems he missed a bracket. In the numerator there are 4 ( brackets and only 3 ) brackets.

but other than that... I am recreating it correctly?

ok so like this right?

Γ [1-∝(s)] Γ [1-∝(t)]
__________________
Γ [z-∝(s) -∝(t)]
 
No, the "Euler equation" they are talking about looks like this:

[tex] \frac{\Gamma(x) \Gamma(y)}{\Gamma(x+y)}[/tex]

So it should be:

[tex] \frac{\Gamma(1-\alpha(s)) \Gamma(1-\alpha(t))}{\Gamma(2-\alpha(s)-\alpha(t))}[/tex]

A two not a z.