Eulers equation, i think? leonard suskin

  • Thread starter Thread starter jerkazoid
  • Start date Start date
jerkazoid
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
leonard susskind writes this on the chalk board a little after 1/2 way in this Nova episode on String theory

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/programs/ht/qt/3013_03.html
3536633512_73e6d9aedf_o.jpg

am i writing this correctly?

Γ [1-∝(s) Γ (1-∝(t)]
__________________
Γ [z-∝(s) -∝(t)]
edit spelld his name wrong
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Unless I am missing something it seems he missed a bracket. In the numerator there are 4 ( brackets and only 3 ) brackets.
 
Cyosis said:
Unless I am missing something it seems he missed a bracket. In the numerator there are 4 ( brackets and only 3 ) brackets.

but other than that... I am recreating it correctly?

ok so like this right?

Γ [1-∝(s)] Γ [1-∝(t)]
__________________
Γ [z-∝(s) -∝(t)]
 
No, the "Euler equation" they are talking about looks like this:

<br /> \frac{\Gamma(x) \Gamma(y)}{\Gamma(x+y)}<br />

So it should be:

<br /> \frac{\Gamma(1-\alpha(s)) \Gamma(1-\alpha(t))}{\Gamma(2-\alpha(s)-\alpha(t))}<br />

A two not a z.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top