Evaluate a limit using a series expansion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the limit L = \lim_{x\to\ 1}\frac{\sqrt[4]{80+x}-(3+\frac{(x-1)}{108})}{(x-1)^{2}} using a series expansion. The context is rooted in calculus, specifically in the application of Taylor series and binomial expansion for functions near a point of interest.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the challenges of applying L'Hospital's rule and the necessity of using a series expansion instead. There are considerations about choosing an appropriate expansion point and the implications of using derivatives. Some participants suggest rewriting the function in a form that might simplify the expansion process.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods of approaching the limit. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of binomial expansion and the potential substitution of variables to facilitate the series expansion. However, there is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants express frustration with the complexity of derivatives involved in the Taylor expansion and the limitations of applying L'Hospital's rule multiple times. There is a focus on ensuring that the solution adheres to the requirement of using a series expansion.

Perrault
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use a series expansion to calculate L = \lim_{x\to\ 1}\frac{\sqrt[4]{80+x}-(3+\frac{(x-1)}{108})}{(x-1)^{2}}

Homework Equations



A function f(x)'s Taylor Series (if it exists) is equal to \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{f^{(n)}(x)}{n!}\cdot (x-a)^{n}
Newton's binomial theorem states that for all |x| < 1 and for any s we have \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(s choose n)\cdotx^{n}

The Attempt at a Solution



This question is particularly aggravating since L'Hospital's rule applied twice consecutively yields L = \frac{-3}{32\cdot\sqrt[4]{81^{7}}} = -\frac{1}{23328}, but that wouldn't be suitable given that no series expansion was used.

Using a Taylor expansion would require using an expansion point (a) different than 1, since it is that very point which we need in the first place. Using any other expansion point would require finding the series' radius of convergence. An alternative would be using L'Hospital's rule once, then trying to find that new limit's Taylor series. But don't you dare use L'Hospital's rule twice because that would give us the answer right away without using a series expansion :smile:
In any case, using a Taylor expansion sounds pretty desperate as the function's second, third, and fourth derivative are increasingly huge.

I couldn't get anywhere neither by rearranging the terms nor by using some form of substitution.

Help! :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Perrault said:

Homework Statement



Use a series expansion to calculate L = \lim_{x\to\ 1}\frac{\sqrt[4]{80+x}-(3+\frac{(x-1)}{108})}{(x-1)^{2}}

Homework Equations



A function f(x)'s Taylor Series (if it exists) is equal to \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{f^{(n)}(x)}{n!}\cdot (x-a)^{n}
Newton's binomial theorem states that for all |x| < 1 and for any s we have \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(s choose n)\cdotx^{n}

The Attempt at a Solution



This question is particularly aggravating since L'Hospital's rule applied twice consecutively yields L = \frac{-3}{32\cdot\sqrt[4]{81^{7}}} = -\frac{1}{23328}, but that wouldn't be suitable given that no series expansion was used.

Using a Taylor expansion would require using an expansion point (a) different than 1, since it is that very point which we need in the first place. Using any other expansion point would require finding the series' radius of convergence. An alternative would be using L'Hospital's rule once, then trying to find that new limit's Taylor series. But don't you dare use L'Hospital's rule twice because that would give us the answer right away without using a series expansion :smile:
In any case, using a Taylor expansion sounds pretty desperate as the function's second, third, and fourth derivative are increasingly huge.

I couldn't get anywhere neither by rearranging the terms nor by using some form of substitution.

Help! :smile:

Try writing ##\sqrt[4]{80+x}## as ##(81 + (x-1))^\frac 1 4## and expand that. You shouldn't need more than a few terms.
 
LCKurtz said:
Try writing ##\sqrt[4]{80+x}## as ##(81 + (x-1))^\frac 1 4## and expand that. You shouldn't need more than a few terms.

I'm sorry, I don't understand exactly what you are suggesting. How is ##(81 + (x-1))^\frac 1 4## any easier to expand than ##\sqrt[4]{80+x}##?
Thanks for your help!
 
Perrault said:
I'm sorry, I don't understand exactly what you are suggesting. How is ##(81 + (x-1))^\frac 1 4## any easier to expand than ##\sqrt[4]{80+x}##?
Thanks for your help!
Well, then x always appears as (x-1) . You could perhaps, substitute u = x-1 .

Look at the Taylor expansion of \sqrt[4]{81+(x-1)}\,, or \sqrt[4]{81+u}\ .

Then rather than asking LCKurtz why he suggested the change, you can ask how he came up with such a useful suggestion.
 
Perrault said:
I'm sorry, I don't understand exactly what you are suggesting. How is ##(81 + (x-1))^\frac 1 4## any easier to expand than ##\sqrt[4]{80+x}##?
Thanks for your help!

Just write out the first few terms of the binomial expansion for fractional exponents. You know, it starts with ##81^{\frac 1 4}(x-1)^0 +\, ...##. Hopefully you know how to do that without using Taylor's expansion, although that will work.
 
Thanks LCKurtz, it worked :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K