Evaluating Higher Order Poles: A Simple Download

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Living_Dog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Higher order Poles
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of higher order poles in complex analysis, specifically in the context of integrating a function involving poles. Participants explore methods for calculating residues and the implications of different types of poles in integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on evaluating higher order poles and mentions a specific integral involving the function \(\frac{(1 + x^2)}{(1 + x^4)}\).
  • Another participant questions the region of integration and notes a formatting issue with the LaTeX expression.
  • A different participant explains the concept of simple poles and provides a detailed method for evaluating residues, including the use of Laurent series for higher order poles.
  • Some participants assert that the poles of the function in question are simple, as the denominator \(1 + x^4\) has simple zeros.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the nature of the poles being discussed, with some participants asserting they are simple while others reference higher order poles. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific evaluation techniques for higher order poles.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not clearly defined the region of integration, which may affect the evaluation of the integral. Additionally, there is ambiguity regarding the classification of poles as simple or higher order, which influences the methods discussed.

Living_Dog
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
I need to know how to evaluate higher order poles.

I have the answer for the integral of this function

[tex]\frac{(1 + x^2)}{(1 + x^4)}[\tex]<br /> <br /> from integrals.wolfram.com, but think it can be done using residues. I believe it involves taking a derivative and then multiplying by the pole? Can someone give me the simple download on what the math technique is... without all the high-dimensional mathematical proof... if you don't mind. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /><br /> <br /> <i>Thankis in advance!</i><br /> -LD<br /> ________________________________________________<br /> http://www.angelfire.com/ny5/jbc33/"[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Wait.. What is the region of integration..
Your tex did not come out...
 
End tex with [/ tex], not [\tex] (and remove the space).

Living Dog, I assume this is over a closed path but it is crucial that we know what poles are contained inside the path.

I don't see why you are asking about "higher order" poles. x4+ 1 factors as (x+1)(x-1)(x+i)(x-i) and has each of 1, -1, i, and -i as a simple pole. Saying that a function has a simple pole at x= a means that it can be written F(x)= f(x)+ A/(x-a) where f(x) is analytic at x= a. The integral of an analytic function around any close curve is 0 so the integral of F(x) around any closed curve containing a (and no other poles) is equal to the integral of A/(x-a). Of course, that would be the same for any closed path containing a. In particular, we can take a circular path with center a and radius R. On that curve, [itex]x= a+ Re^{i\theta}[/itex] so [itex](x- a)^{-1}= R^{-1}e^{-i\theta}[/itex] and [itex]dx= iRe^{i\theta}d\theta[/itex]. That is:
[tex]\int A/(x-a)dx= i\int_0^{2\pi}d\theta= 2\pi iA[/tex]
Since F(x)= f(x)+ A/(x-a), F(x)(x-a)= f(x)(x-a)+ A. f(x) is analytic so its limit as x-> a is 0 and we have A= lim(x->a)F(x)(x-a).

If F does have a higher order pole, say of order n, then it can be written as a "Laurent" series- a series involving fractional powers to power n:
[tex]F(x)= f(x)+ A/(x-a)+ B/(x-a)^2+\cdot\cdot\cdot+ Z/(x-a)^n[/tex]
But it is still true that the integral, around any closed path containing a as its only pole, of every term except A(x-a) is 0 and the integral of A/(x-a) is [itex]2\pi i A[/itex]. To find A multiply by (x-a)n:
[tex]F(x)(x-a)^n= f(x)(x-a)^n+ A(x-a)^{n-1}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ Z[/tex]
Now differentiate n-1 times:
[tex]\frac{d^{n-1}[F(x)(x-a)^n]}{dx^{n-1}}= \frac{d^{n-1}[f(x)(x-a)^n]}{dx^{n-1}}+ (n-1)!A[/tex]
Since f(x) is analytic, so is f(x)(x-a)n-1 and so its' n-1 derivative is continuous: its limit at a is 0. We have
[tex]A= \frac{1}{(n-1)!} \lim_{x\rightarrow a}\frac{d^{n-1}[F(x)(x-a)^{n-1}]}{dx^{n-1}}[/tex]
for the residue at a pole of order n.
 
these are simple poles. i.e. since 1+x^4 has simple zeroes, dividing by it produces simple poles.
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K