Evaluating integral from -∞ to ∞

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wahaj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of improper integrals, specifically the integral from negative infinity to positive infinity. Participants explore different methods for evaluating such integrals and the implications of splitting the integral versus keeping it in its original form.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether to split the integral into two parts or evaluate it in its original form.
  • Another participant suggests that the approach depends on the expression obtained for the indefinite integral and notes that many integrals require more than just finding an antiderivative.
  • A participant shares their experience with the integral \int^∞_{-∞} \frac{1}{2}\tan^{-1}(x^2) and mentions that splitting the integral yields a different answer compared to keeping it together.
  • It is noted that since the function is even, the property \int_{-a}^a f(x) \,dx = 2\int_0^a f(x) \,dx can be applied, allowing evaluation as 2\int_0^{\infty} \frac{1}{2}\arctan(x^2) \,dx.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of correctly defining the limits of integration and distinguishes between the definitions of \int_0^\infty f(x) \,dx and \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x) \,dx.
  • A participant acknowledges their mistake in using the same variable for both limits, attributing their incorrect answer to this error.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the method of evaluation for improper integrals, with some advocating for splitting the integral and others suggesting that it depends on the specific function involved. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for careful consideration of limits and definitions when evaluating improper integrals, indicating potential limitations in their approaches.

wahaj
Messages
154
Reaction score
2
When evaluating an integral [tex]\int^∞_{-∞}[/tex] do I have to split the integral up like [tex]\int^∞_0 + \int^0_{-∞}[/tex] and evaluate it this way or can I simply keep the integral in it's original form and plug in infinity and negative infinity into the expression and evaluate it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on the expression you get for the indefinite integral. In practice most of the integrals of this nature require more than getting an antiderivative.
 
Well right now I am just learning how to solve improper integrals. I was working on [tex]\int^∞_{-∞} \frac{1}{2}tan^{-1} x^2[/tex]. I don't know if I am doing this right but splitting up and keeping the integral together gets me two different answers. Splitting it up gets me the right answer
 
Since it's an even function, the property [tex]\displaystyle \int_{-a}^a{ f(x)\,dx } = 2\int_0^a{f(x)\,dx}[/tex] holds.

So that means you can evaluate it as [tex]\displaystyle 2\int_0^{\infty}{\frac{1}{2}\arctan{\left( x^2 \right)} \,dx}[/tex].
 
wahaj said:
Well right now I am just learning how to solve improper integrals. I was working on [tex]\int^∞_{-∞} \frac{1}{2}tan^{-1} x^2[/tex]. I don't know if I am doing this right but splitting up and keeping the integral together gets me two different answers. Splitting it up gets me the right answer
Please tell us what two different answer you get.

You should know that [itex]\int_0^\infty f(x)dx[/itex] is defined as [itex]\lim_{a\to\infty}\int_0^a f(x) dx[/itex] while [itex]\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x)dx[/itex] is defined as [itex]\lim_{a\to -\infty}\lim_{b\to\infty} \int_a^b f(x)dx[/itex].


In particular, you cannot use the same variable, and the same limits for the two limits of integration. That is, the "Cauchy Principle Value",
[tex]\lim_{a\to\infty} \int_{-a}^a f(x)dx[/tex]
may exist when the integral itself does not.
 
OK that's why I have been getting the wrong answer. I was using one variable as both limits. Thanks for the answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K