MHB Evaluating/Simplifying an Expression

  • Thread starter Thread starter kingzero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around simplifying a mathematical expression, specifically part f, where uncertainty exists regarding the correct steps to take. A participant expresses doubt about their approach and seeks guidance on whether they are on the right track. Another participant points out that the simplification of the expression leads to \frac{4h}{h}, indicating that x + h - x simplifies to h. This clarification suggests that the expression can be further reduced, emphasizing the importance of recognizing simplifications in algebraic expressions. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for clear understanding in evaluating and simplifying mathematical expressions.
kingzero
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Part f. is the only expression I am unsure of what steps to take to get the correct answer.

Would anyone be willing to give me an idea?
 

Attachments

  • 20191003_180623.jpg
    20191003_180623.jpg
    5.8 KB · Views: 106
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I went ahead and tried it, but I'm still uncertain if I am on the right track.
 

Attachments

  • WIN_20191003_19_12_16_Pro.jpg
    WIN_20191003_19_12_16_Pro.jpg
    22.9 KB · Views: 114
Why did you stop at \frac{4h}{x+ h- x}? You are aware that x+ h- x= h, aren't you?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top