Every Cauchy sequence converges

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cauchy Sequence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that the p-adic numbers, specifically $\mathbb{Q}_p$, are complete with respect to the p-norm, meaning every Cauchy sequence in $\mathbb{Q}_p$ converges. The proof demonstrates that for any Cauchy sequence $(x_i)_{i \in \mathbb{N}}$ in $\mathbb{Q}_p$, one can assume the elements belong to $\mathbb{Z}_p$, leading to the conclusion that the sequence converges to a limit in $\mathbb{Z}_p$. Additionally, an alternative proof is provided, establishing that $\mathbb{Z}_p$ is a compact space, which implies completeness under the p-adic metric.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of p-adic numbers, specifically $\mathbb{Q}_p$ and $\mathbb{Z}_p$.
  • Familiarity with Cauchy sequences and their properties in metric spaces.
  • Knowledge of compactness in topology and its implications for completeness.
  • Basic concepts of metric spaces and the p-adic metric.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of p-adic integers and their role in number theory.
  • Learn about the topology of compact spaces and their implications for convergence.
  • Explore the concept of projective limits in topology, particularly in relation to p-adic numbers.
  • Investigate the process of "defractionizing" $\mathbb{Q}_p$ to understand its completeness.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students studying advanced topics in analysis and topology, particularly those interested in p-adic analysis and its applications.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hey! (Wave)

Sentence:

The p-adic numbers are complete with respect to the p-norm, ie every Cauchy sequence converges.

Proof:

Let $(x_i)_{i \in \mathbb{N}}$ a Cauchy-sequence in $\mathbb{Q}_p$.

We want to show that, without loss of generality, we can suppose that $x_i \in \mathbb{Z}_p$.Let the set $\{ |x_i|_p | i \in \mathbb{N}\} \subset \mathbb{R}$. We suppose that it is upper bounded. If not, there are $\forall m \in \mathbb{N}$ and $N \in \mathbb{N}$ two indices $i,j \geq N$ with $|x_i|_p> |x_j|_p \geq p^m$.

From the sentence: For $|x|_p \neq |y|_p$, it stands that $|x+y|_p=\max \{|x|_p, |y|_p \} $, we have that $|x_i-x_j|_p=|x_i|_p>p^m$. This is not possible for a Cauchy-sequence.

Now, we pick $m \in \mathbb{N}$ with $p^m \geq \max \{ |x_i|_p | i \in \mathbb{N}_0 \}$. Then, $(p^m x_i)_i$ is a Cauchy-sequence with $|p^mx_i|_p \leq 1 \Rightarrow p^mx_i \in \mathbb{Z}_p$. It converges exactly then, when $(x_i)_i$ converges.So, we just need to consider a Cauchy-sequence $(x_i)_i \in \mathbb{Z}_p$. We want to show that it converges and to determine its limit $z \in \mathbb{Z}_p$. For each $k \in \mathbb{N}$, we pick a $N_k \in \mathbb{N}$, so that:

$$|x_i-x_j|_p<p^{-k} ,\text{ for } i,j \geq N_k$$

We can suppose, that $N_k$ is an increasing sequence.The above inequality is equivalent to $v_p(x_i-x_j)>k$ or $x_i-x_j \in p^{k+1} \mathbb{Z}_p$. So, we find a $z_k \in \mathbb{Z}$, such that:

$$z_k \equiv x_i \equiv x_i \mod p^{k+1}\mathbb{Z}_p, \text{ for } i,j \geq N_k$$

Because of $N_{k+1} \geq N_k$, it stands that:
$$z_{k+1} \equiv x_{N_{k+1}} \equiv x_{N_k} \equiv z_k \mod p^{k+1} \mathbb{Z}_p$$

ie. $z=(\overline{z_k})_k \in \Pi \mathbb{Z}/p^{k+1}\mathbb{Z}$ is an element from $\mathbb{Z}_p$. Also, for $i \geq N_k$, it stands that:
$$x_i \equiv z_k \equiv \ \mod p^{k+1}\mathbb{Z}_p \Rightarrow |x_i-z|_p<p^{-p}$$

so $x_i$ converges to $z$.
Could you explain me step by step the above proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is an easier proof that minimizes the use of $\varepsilon$'s . First define $X_n = \mathbb{Z}/p^n \mathbb{Z}$, and give these finite sets the discrete topology. The $p$-adic integers are the projective limit of the $X_n$.

Now consider the product,
$$ X = \prod_{n=1}^{\infty} X_n $$
This is a compact space because each $X_n$ is compact. Furthermore, $\mathbb{Z}_p$ is a closed subset of $X$. Thus, $\mathbb{Z}_p$ is a compact space.

This means that if you can find a metric which describes the topology on $\mathbb{Z}_p$ the metric must automatically be complete (since compact metric spaces are complete). You have to show, which is not so difficult, that the $p$-metric induces the same topology as $\mathbb{Z}_p$ inherits from being a subspace of $X$.

This will prove that $\mathbb{Z}_p$ is complete with respect to the $p$-adic metric. To show that $\mathbb{Q}_p$ is complete you "defractionize" it.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K