Exact Differential Equations of Order n?

  • Thread starter bolbteppa
  • Start date
  • #1
309
38

Main Question or Discussion Point

A second order ode [itex]Py'' + Qy' + Ry = 0[/itex] is exact if there exists a first order ode [itex] Ay' + By [/itex] such that

[tex] (Ay' + By)' = Ay'' + (A' + B)y' + B'y = Py'' + Qy' + Ry = 0[/tex]

How can one cast the analysis of this question in terms of exact differential equations?

In other words, could somebody explain this interesting quote:

The derivation of the conditions of exact integrability of an ordinary differential equation of the nth. order (or of a differential expression involving derivatives of a single dependent variable with regard to a single independent variable) is sometimes made to depend upon the theory of integration of an expression, exact in the sense of the foregoing chapter. As however the connection is not immediate and this method is not the principal method, it will be sufficient here to give the following references to some of the writers on the subject, in whose memoirs references to Euler, Lagrange, Lexell, and Condorcet, will be found in ...
Forsyth - Page 33
Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Simon Bridge
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
17,848
1,645
exact in the sense of the foregoing chapter
... see foregoing chapter.
(reads) seems the author launches into investigating "exact" equations without making a general definition.
That's a pretty nasty text btw. I'd be remiss if I didn't advise you to ditch it.

For an idea how the concept of "exactness" may apply to higher order ODEs see instead:
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/DSolveExactLinearSecondOrderODEs.html
 
  • #3
That doesn't help, neither the insult nor the link, but thanks...

The book does Frobenius' theorem in like a page, & spends hundreds of pages on inexact equations & is filled with history as well as substance, I'm surprised anyone with any appreciation for such a subject would write something like this off so easily. Also, the definition you've provided should really be a theorem if we're trying to link higher order exactness with first order exactness, but how and ever...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #4
Simon Bridge
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
17,848
1,645
Sorry - no insult intended.
Please note that I have not provided any definitions.
If the text works for you then that is great and I'm sure you'll figure out what the author is talking about in due course.

However, I don't think I can provide the answer in the form you are looking for.
I'll see if I can attract someone else.
Cheers.
 

Related Threads on Exact Differential Equations of Order n?

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
24
Views
13K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
998
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
718
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Top