Exact Differential Equations of Order n?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conditions for exactness in second-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs) represented by the equation Py'' + Qy' + Ry = 0. It highlights the relationship between second-order ODEs and first-order ODEs, specifically through the expression Ay' + By. The conversation critiques a referenced text for its lack of clarity and excessive focus on inexact equations, while suggesting alternative resources for understanding the concept of exactness in higher-order ODEs, such as the Wolfram Mathematica tutorial on exact linear second-order ODEs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with first-order and second-order ODEs
  • Knowledge of exact differential equations
  • Basic comprehension of Frobenius' theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conditions for exactness in second-order ODEs
  • Explore the Wolfram Mathematica tutorial on DSolve for exact linear second-order ODEs
  • Review Frobenius' theorem and its applications to differential equations
  • Investigate the historical context and contributions of Euler, Lagrange, Lexell, and Condorcet to the theory of differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of differential equations, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of exact differential equations and their applications in higher-order ODEs.

bolbteppa
Messages
300
Reaction score
41
A second order ode Py'' + Qy' + Ry = 0 is exact if there exists a first order ode Ay' + By such that

(Ay' + By)' = Ay'' + (A' + B)y' + B'y = Py'' + Qy' + Ry = 0

How can one cast the analysis of this question in terms of exact differential equations?

In other words, could somebody explain this interesting quote:

The derivation of the conditions of exact integrability of an ordinary differential equation of the nth. order (or of a differential expression involving derivatives of a single dependent variable with regard to a single independent variable) is sometimes made to depend upon the theory of integration of an expression, exact in the sense of the foregoing chapter. As however the connection is not immediate and this method is not the principal method, it will be sufficient here to give the following references to some of the writers on the subject, in whose memoirs references to Euler, Lagrange, Lexell, and Condorcet, will be found in ...
Forsyth - Page 33

Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Physics news on Phys.org
exact in the sense of the foregoing chapter
... see foregoing chapter.
(reads) seems the author launches into investigating "exact" equations without making a general definition.
That's a pretty nasty text btw. I'd be remiss if I didn't advise you to ditch it.

For an idea how the concept of "exactness" may apply to higher order ODEs see instead:
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/DSolveExactLinearSecondOrderODEs.html
 
That doesn't help, neither the insult nor the link, but thanks...

The book does Frobenius' theorem in like a page, & spends hundreds of pages on inexact equations & is filled with history as well as substance, I'm surprised anyone with any appreciation for such a subject would write something like this off so easily. Also, the definition you've provided should really be a theorem if we're trying to link higher order exactness with first order exactness, but how and ever...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Sorry - no insult intended.
Please note that I have not provided any definitions.
If the text works for you then that is great and I'm sure you'll figure out what the author is talking about in due course.

However, I don't think I can provide the answer in the form you are looking for.
I'll see if I can attract someone else.
Cheers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K