Exact Sequences - D&F Section 10.5, Proposition 27

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Section Sequences
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the proof of Proposition 27 from Dummit and Foote's Section 10.5 on Exact Sequences, specifically regarding the homomorphism of abelian groups defined by a map between R-modules. Participants seek clarification on the formal proof and justification of steps involved in demonstrating that the map is indeed a homomorphism.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the justification for certain steps in the proof of Proposition 27, particularly regarding the operation of composition of functions.
  • Another participant clarifies that the operation in Hom_R(D,L) is pointwise addition and emphasizes the need to verify that the map is R-linear.
  • Participants discuss the need to confirm that the map defined by ψ' is indeed in Hom_R(D,M) and provide steps to show this, including verifying additivity and R-linearity.
  • There is a focus on the necessity of understanding the operations involved in the abelian groups to properly formulate the proof.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the steps needed to show that the map is a homomorphism, but there is no consensus on the clarity of the proof or the justification of certain steps, indicating ongoing uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of understanding the definitions and operations in the context of Hom_R(D,L) and Hom_R(D,M), which may not be fully resolved in the discussion.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Dummit and Foote Section 10.5 Exact Sequences - Projective, Injective and Flat Modules.

I need some help in understanding D&F's proof of Proposition 27, Section 10.5, page 386 (see attachment).

Proposition 27 reads as follows: (see attachment)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let D, L and M be R-modules and let

$$ \psi \ : \ L \to M $$

be an R-module homomorphism.

Then the map

$$ {\psi}' \ : \ Hom_R (D, L) \to Hom_R (D, M) $$

where $$ f \to f' = \psi \circ f $$

is a homomorphism of abelian groups. ... ...

... ... ... "

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D&F start their proof of the proposition as follows:

"The fact that $$ {\psi}' $$ is a homomorphism is immediate. ... ... "Can someone please help me formulate an explicit, formal and rigorous proof of this proposition (however short and obvious it is!).
My tentative thoughts are as follows:

$$ {\psi}' \ : \ f \to f' $$ is a homomorphism

$$ \Longrightarrow {\psi}' (f_1 \circ f_2) = {\psi}' (f_1) \cdot {\psi}' (f_2) $$

(where $$ \circ $$ and $$ \cdot $$ are both the operation of composition of functions)

Now $$ {\psi}' (f_1 \circ f_2) = \psi \circ (f_1 \circ f_2) $$

Then I want to write:

$$ \psi \circ (f_1 \circ f_2) = ( \psi \circ f_1 ) \circ ( \psi \circ f_2 ) $$

but what would be the justification for this step?

... ... can some please help me in the task of formulating a rigorous proof?

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am reading Dummit and Foote Section 10.5 Exact Sequences - Projective, Injective and Flat Modules.

I need some help in understanding D&F's proof of Proposition 27, Section 10.5, page 386 (see attachment).

Proposition 27 reads as follows: (see attachment)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let D, L and M be R-modules and let

$$ \psi \ : \ L \to M $$

be an R-module homomorphism.

Then the map

$$ {\psi}' \ : \ Hom_R (D, L) \to Hom_R (D, M) $$

where $$ f \to f' = \psi \circ f $$

is a homomorphism of abelian groups. ... ...

... ... ... "

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D&F start their proof of the proposition as follows:

"The fact that $$ {\psi}' $$ is a homomorphism is immediate. ... ... "Can someone please help me formulate an explicit, formal and rigorous proof of this proposition (however short and obvious it is!).
My tentative thoughts are as follows:

$$ {\psi}' \ : \ f \to f' $$ is a homomorphism

$$ \Longrightarrow {\psi}' (f_1 \circ f_2) = {\psi}' (f_1) \cdot {\psi}' (f_2) $$

(where $$ \circ $$ and $$ \cdot $$ are both the operation of composition of functions)

Now $$ {\psi}' (f_1 \circ f_2) = \psi \circ (f_1 \circ f_2) $$

Then I want to write:

$$ \psi \circ (f_1 \circ f_2) = ( \psi \circ f_1 ) \circ ( \psi \circ f_2 ) $$

but what would be the justification for this step?

... ... can some please help me in the task of formulating a rigorous proof?

Peter

I think I have clarified my thinking ... hopefully someone will confirm this is the case ...

I began wondering about the operation between elements in the abelian group $$ Hom_R (D,L) $$ ... it is necessary to have this clear when considering the map

$$ {\psi}' \ : \ Hom_R (D, L) \to Hom_R (D, M) $$

where $$ f \to f' = \psi \circ f $$

as a homomorphism.

So, basically when we consider the defining equation of a group homomorphism in this case - visually:

$$ {\psi}' (f_1 \circ f_2) = {\psi}' (f_1) \cdot {\psi}' (f_2) $$

we need to examine the binary operation in the abelian group $$ Hom_R (D,L) $$ and following D&F Proposition 2, Section 10.2 we have, given two elements $$ f_1 \text{ and } f_2 \in Hom_R (D,L) $$:

$$ (f_1 +_D f_2) (d) = f_1(d) +_L f_2 (d) \text{ for all } d \in D $$

So when considering $$ {\psi}' $$ we should write:

$$ {\psi}' $$ is a homomorphism

$$ \Longrightarrow {\psi}' (f_1 +_D f_2) = {\psi}' (f_1) +_L {\psi}' (f_2) $$

Now we have

$$ {\psi}' (f_1 +_D f_2) = \psi \circ ( f_1 +_D f_2) $$

Can someone confirm that this revision in my thinking is correct?

I now wish to proceed to say that:

$$ \psi \circ ( f_1 +_D f_2) = (\psi \circ f_1) +_M (\psi \circ f_1) = {\psi}' (f_1) +_M {\psi}' (f_2) $$

But how do I justify this step - maybe I have to examine functional values? Can someone please help?

Peter
 
The operation in $\text{Hom}_R(D,L)$ is "pointwise addition" that is:

$(f_1 + f_2)(d) = f_1(d) +_L f_2(d)$ for $f_1,f_2 \in \text{Hom}_R(D,L), d \in D$.

(the addition in $\text{Hom}_R(D,L)$ takes place in that group, NOT in $D$).

The only time "addition in $D$" comes into the picture is when we verify that $f_1 + f_2$ is indeed a member of $\text{Hom}_R(D,L)$ (that is, show it is $R$-linear).

So you must verify that:

$\psi'(f_1 + f_2) = \psi'(f_1) + \psi'(f_2)$.

The addition on the left takes place in $\text{Hom}_R(D,L)$, the addition on the right takes place in $\text{Hom}_R(D,M)$.

First, we might want to show explicitly, that $\psi'(f) = \psi \circ f$ is actually IN $\text{Hom}_R(D,M)$.

To do this, pick any two arbitrary elements $d_1,d_2 \in D$ with $r$ any element of $R$.

Then:

$\psi'(f)(d_1 +_D d_2) = \psi(f(d_1 +_D d_2)) = \psi(f(d_1) +_L f(d_2))$

$ = \psi(f(d_1)) +_M \psi(f(d_2)) = \psi'(f)(d_1) +_M \psi'(f)(d_2)$

so $\psi'(f)$ is certainly an additive map ( that is, is in $\text{Hom}_{\ \Bbb Z}(D,M)$).

and furthermore:

$\psi'(f)(r\cdot d_1) = \psi(f(r\cdot d_1)) = \psi(r\cdot f(d_1))$

$= r\cdot \psi(f(d_1)) = r \cdot (\psi'(f)(d_1))$, so $\psi'(f)$ is $R$-linear.

Now show that for any $d \in D$ that:

$\psi'(f_1 + f_2)(d) = \psi'(f_1)(d) + \psi'(f_2)(d)$

(this equality takes place in $M$), which will show that:

$\psi'(f_1 + f_2)$ and $\psi'(f_1) + \psi'(f_2)$ are the same element of $\text{Hom}_R(D,M)$.

(This is quite straight-forward, everything goes through as you would expect).
 
Deveno said:
The operation in $\text{Hom}_R(D,L)$ is "pointwise addition" that is:

$(f_1 + f_2)(d) = f_1(d) +_L f_2(d)$ for $f_1,f_2 \in \text{Hom}_R(D,L), d \in D$.

(the addition in $\text{Hom}_R(D,L)$ takes place in that group, NOT in $D$).

The only time "addition in $D$" comes into the picture is when we verify that $f_1 + f_2$ is indeed a member of $\text{Hom}_R(D,L)$ (that is, show it is $R$-linear).

So you must verify that:

$\psi'(f_1 + f_2) = \psi'(f_1) + \psi'(f_2)$.

The addition on the left takes place in $\text{Hom}_R(D,L)$, the addition on the right takes place in $\text{Hom}_R(D,M)$.

First, we might want to show explicitly, that $\psi'(f) = \psi \circ f$ is actually IN $\text{Hom}_R(D,M)$.

To do this, pick any two arbitrary elements $d_1,d_2 \in D$ with $r$ any element of $R$.

Then:

$\psi'(f)(d_1 +_D d_2) = \psi(f(d_1 +_D d_2)) = \psi(f(d_1) +_L f(d_2))$

$ = \psi(f(d_1)) +_M \psi(f(d_2)) = \psi'(f)(d_1) +_M \psi'(f)(d_2)$

so $\psi'(f)$ is certainly an additive map ( that is, is in $\text{Hom}_{\ \Bbb Z}(D,M)$).

and furthermore:

$\psi'(f)(r\cdot d_1) = \psi(f(r\cdot d_1)) = \psi(r\cdot f(d_1))$

$= r\cdot \psi(f(d_1)) = r \cdot (\psi'(f)(d_1))$, so $\psi'(f)$ is $R$-linear.

Now show that for any $d \in D$ that:

$\psi'(f_1 + f_2)(d) = \psi'(f_1)(d) + \psi'(f_2)(d)$

(this equality takes place in $M$), which will show that:

$\psi'(f_1 + f_2)$ and $\psi'(f_1) + \psi'(f_2)$ are the same element of $\text{Hom}_R(D,M)$.

(This is quite straight-forward, everything goes through as you would expect).

Thanks for a really clear and helpful post, Deveno

Appreciate the help,

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K